...
首页> 外文期刊>Expert opinion on biological therapy >In vitro proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on hydroxyapatite versus human demineralised bone matrix with and without osteogenic protein-1.
【24h】

In vitro proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on hydroxyapatite versus human demineralised bone matrix with and without osteogenic protein-1.

机译:人间充质干细胞在羟基磷灰石上与有或没有成骨蛋白-1的人脱矿质骨基质的体外增殖和分化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Allografting is currently used in lower limb reconstruction surgery. Demineralised bone matrix (DBM) is more osteoinductive compared with allografts but lacks mechanical strength. Osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) can improve the osteoinductivity of the allograft, however recent reports indicate significant allograft resorption when it is combined with OP-1. OBJECTIVES: Our hypothesis was that hydroxyapatite (HA) with human-mesenchymal stem cells (h-MSCs) and OP-1 (HA+h-MSCs+OP-1) has similar osteoinductive properties to human-DBM+h-MSCs. The objective was to evaluate h-MSC proliferation (by tritiated thymidine incorporation, total DNA Hoechst 33258 and scanning electron microscopy) and osteogenic differentiation (from alkaline phosphatase activity) in human demineralised bone matrix (h-DBM) and HA, with or without OP-1. RESULTS: H-MSC proliferation on HA+OP-1 was significantly higher compared with that on HA at all time points (p < 0.05) and compared with DBM alone [day 1, (198.4 vs 95.4) p = 0.042; day 14 (286.1 vs 119.9), p < 0.001]. H-MSC proliferation was higher in DBM+OP-1, at all time points compared with HA+OP-1 but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). H-MSC differentiation was significantly higher in HA+OP-1 compared with HA (p < 0.05) but not significantly different from diffferentiation on DBM alone (p > 0.05). Differentiation was significantly higher on DBM+OP-1 at all time points compared with HA (p < 0.05) and with HA+OP-1 [day 1, (21.1 vs 10.1) (p = 0.03); day 7 (39.4 vs 7.1) (p < 0.01); day 14 (40.2 vs 14.4) (p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS: When HA+h-MSCs is combined with OP-1 in vitro its osteogenic potential is similar to that of DBM+h-MSCs alone which may be adequate for non-weight-bearing applications. Mechanical testing however is of great importance for weight-bearing applications and the in vivo testing of the composite graft HA+h-MSCs+OP-1 vs DBM+h-MSCs is recommended.
机译:背景:同种异体移植目前用于下肢重建手术中。与同种异体移植相比,脱矿质骨基质(DBM)具有更高的骨诱导性,但缺乏机械强度。成骨蛋白1(OP-1)可以改善同种异体移植物的骨诱导性,但是最近的报道表明,同种异体移植物与OP-1结合时,其吸收能力显着提高。目的:我们的假设是具有人间质干细胞(h-MSCs)和OP-1(HA + h-MSCs + OP-1)的羟磷灰石(HA)具有与人DBM + h-MSC相似的骨诱导特性。目的是评估人脱矿质骨基质(h-DBM)和HA中有无OP的h-MSC增殖(通过tri化胸苷掺入,总DNA Hoechst 33258和扫描电子显微镜)和成骨分化(由碱性磷酸酶活性决定) -1。结果:在所有时间点,HA + OP-1上的H-MSC增殖均明显高于HA(p <0.05),且与单独的DBM相比[第1天(198.4 vs 95.4),p = 0.042;第14天(286.1 vs 119.9),p <0.001]。在所有时间点,DBM + OP-1中的H-MSC增殖均高于HA + OP-1,但差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。与HA相比,HA + OP-1中的H-MSC分化显着更高(p <0.05),但与仅DBM的分化没有显着差异(p> 0.05)。与HA(p <0.05)和HA + OP-1(第1天,(21.1 vs 10.1),p = 0.03)相比,DBM + OP-1在所有时间点的差异均显着更高。第7天(39.4 vs 7.1)(p <0.01);第14天(40.2 vs 14.4)(p <0.001)]。结论:当HA + h-MSC与OP-1在体外联合使用时,其成骨潜力类似于单独使用DBM + h-MSC的成骨潜能,这可能适合非负重应用。然而,机械测试对于承重应用非常重要,建议对复合移植HA + h-MSCs + OP-1与DBM + h-MSC进行体内测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号