...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based dentistry >Centric splints more effective than distraction splints in anterior disc displacement without reduction?
【24h】

Centric splints more effective than distraction splints in anterior disc displacement without reduction?

机译:中心夹板比不牵张夹板更有效地治疗前椎间盘移位而不减少?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

DESIGN: A single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted in a university prosthodontics department in Germany. INTERVENTION: Only people who presented a clear-cut clinical diagnosis of anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDWR) were included: limited mouth opening with deflection, and limited lateral movement of the incisors and/or pain had to be found. Additionally, patients had to present at least one antagonistic molar contact on each side. The clinical finding was verified by magnetic resonance images in open and closed mouth positions. After clinical examination and imaging, centric splints or distraction splints were randomly assigned. Patients were instructed to wear the splint 18 h each day. Directions as to the care of the splint were given. OUTCOME MEASURE: After 1, 3 and 6 months of therapy, patients provided their subjective evaluation by filling out a visual analogue scale form. Any change in their pain level or functional performance level was recorded. The outcome was evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs. Success after 6 months was defined as improvement in active mouth opening of greater than 20% and pain reduction (on chewing) of at least 50%. Success was statistically verified using a logistic regression test. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (65 females and nine males) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. Thirty-eight patients received a centric splint and 36 a distraction splint. The improvements in mouth opening were significant in both groups. The improvements in pain on chewing, pain during other functions, pain at rest, functional limitation on chewing and other functions were also comparable in the two groups. The logistic regression test, however, suggested that patients using centric splints were treated more successfully than the others (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-8.74). CONCLUSIONS: Centric splints seem to be more effective than distraction splints. Therefore, before the surgical treatment of ADDWR, centric splints should be used instead of distraction splints.
机译:设计:在德国的大学修复科中进行了单盲随机对照试验。干预措施:仅包括对前椎间盘移位无明显改变(ADDWR)进行明确临床诊断的人员:有限的张口发生偏斜,以及切牙的横向运动和/或疼痛受限。此外,患者每侧必须至少出现一种拮抗性臼齿接触。通过在张开和张开的嘴部位置的磁共振图像验证了临床发现。经过临床检查和影像学检查后,随机分配了中心夹板或分散夹板。指示患者每天佩戴夹板18 h。给出了有关夹板护理的指示。观察指标:治疗1、3和6个月后,患者通过填写视觉模拟量表来提供主观评估。记录他们的疼痛水平或功能表现水平的任何变化。使用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验对配对进行评估。 6个月后的成功定义为活动性张口改善大于20%,疼痛减轻(咀嚼时)至少50%。使用Logistic回归测试对成功进行了统计验证。结果:总共74例患者(65名女性和9名男性)符合纳入标准并同意参加。 38例患者接受了中心夹板,36例接受了分散夹板。两组的张口改善均显着。两组的咀嚼痛,其他功能性疼痛,休息时的疼痛,咀嚼功能受限和其他功能的改善也相当。 Logistic回归测试表明,使用中心夹板的患者比其他患者接受的治疗更为成功(优势比为2.88; 95%置信区间为1.01-8.74)。结论:中心夹板似乎比分散夹板更有效。因此,在ADDWR的外科治疗之前,应使用中心夹板代替撑开夹板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号