...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based dentistry >Stannous fluoride toothpastes reduce the gingival index more than sodium fluoride toothpastes.
【24h】

Stannous fluoride toothpastes reduce the gingival index more than sodium fluoride toothpastes.

机译:氟化亚锡牙膏比氟化钠牙膏更能降低牙龈指数。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

DATA SOURCES: Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used to identify sources of data. STUDY SELECTION: Title and abstracts were screened independently. Randomised controlled clinical trials of >6 months duration that used gingivitis or plaque levels as outcome measures were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The mean values and standard deviations were extracted. In studies where standard errors of the mean were reported, standard deviations were calculated by the authors based on the sample size. Weighted means of baseline and of end of trial were calculated with the software Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (version 4.2; The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England) using a random-effects model. A meta-analysis for stannous fluoride (SnF) mouth rinse and dentifrice/ mouthrinse formulations was not performed because there were insufficient data. RESULTS: Fifteen papers were included in the review. For SnF dentifrices, a statistically significant reduction in gingivitis was noted in comparison with control [weighted mean difference (WMD), 0.15 (gingival index) and 0.21 (gingivitis severity index); test for heterogeneity P<0.00001, I(2)=91.1% and P 50.03, I(2)= 80.1%, respectively]. There were inconsistent results for plaque reduction. On using the plaque index, no differences were found, whereas meta-analysis of the Turesky index gave a WMD of 0.31 (P 50.01; test for heterogeneity P 0.0001, I(2)=91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of SnF dentifrices results in greater gingivitis and plaque reduction compared with a conventional dentifrice. The precise magnitude of this effect was difficult to assess because of a high level of heterogeneity in study outcomes.
机译:数据来源:使用Medline和对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册确定数据来源。研究选择:标题和摘要是独立筛选的。选择使用牙龈炎或牙菌斑水平作为结果指标的> 6个月持续时间的随机对照临床试验。数据提取和合成:提取平均值和标准偏差。在报告均值标准误差的研究中,作者根据样本量计算标准差。使用随机效应模型,使用软件Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager(4.2版; Cochrane Collaboration,牛津,英国)计算基线和试验结束的加权平均值。由于没有足够的数据,因此未对氟化亚锡(SnF)漱口水和洁齿剂/漱口水制剂进行荟萃分析。结果:15篇论文被纳入评价。与对照组相比,SnF洁牙剂的牙龈炎在统计学上显着减少[加权平均差异(WMD),0.15(牙龈指数)和0.21(牙龈炎严重程度指数);异质性检验P <0.00001,I(2)= 91.1%,P 50.03,I(2)= 80.1%]。减少牙菌斑的结果不一致。使用菌斑指数时,未发现差异,而对Turesky指数的荟萃分析得出WMD为0.31(P 50.01;异质性检验P 0.0001,I(2)= 91.7%)。结论:与常规洁牙剂相比,使用SnF洁牙剂可导致更大的牙龈炎和牙菌斑减少。由于研究结果的高度异质性,很难评估这种效应的确切程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号