...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >Review: central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections.
【24h】

Review: central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections.

机译:综述:用抗感染药治疗的中心静脉导管可预防与导管相关的血液感染。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

QUESTION Do central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents (AI-CVCs) prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs)? REVIEW SCOPE Included studies compared AI-CVCs with standard CVCs or a different AI-CVC for preventing CRBSIs in patients requiring a CVC. Primary outcome was diagnosis of a CRBSI (the same micro-organism identified in both the catheter and the bloodstream). iEVlEW METHODS Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, SCI/Web of Science, SCI/ISI Proceedings, and Cechram Library (to Sep 2007) were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Trials involving AI-CVCs that required in-house preparation were excluded. 38 RCTs (n = ~9000 patients) met the selection criteria. Methodological quality of the trials was generally poor: 10 RCTs reported adequate concealment of allocation, and 19 RCTs reported blinding of patients, healthcare providers, or outcome assessors. 27 trials that reported appropriate measures of CRBSI were included in the meta-analysis. 6 trials compared 2 different AI-CVCs, but results were not reported in this paper.*
机译:问题用抗感染药(AI-CVC)处理的中心静脉导管是否可以预防导管相关的血流感染(CRBSI)?回顾范围包括在内的研究将AI-CVC与标准CVC或不同的AI-CVC进行了比较,以预防需要CVC的患者出现CRBSI。主要结果是诊断为CRBSI(在导管和血流中都发现了相同的微生物)。互联网方法对Medline,EMBASE / Excerpta Medica,SCI / Web of Science,SCI / ISI Proceedings和Cechram Library(至2007年9月)进行了随机对照试验(RCT)。涉及需要内部准备的AI-CVC的试验被排除在外。 38个RCT(n =约9000例患者)符合选择标准。该试验的方法学质量通常很差:10个RCT报告隐藏了足够的分配,19个RCT报告了患者,医疗保健提供者或结果评估者不知情。荟萃分析包括27项报告了CRBSI的适当措施的试验。 6个试验比较了2种不同的AI-CVC,但本文未报告结果。*

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号