首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >Letter of response to the commentary written by dr howell
【24h】

Letter of response to the commentary written by dr howell

机译:对豪威尔博士的评论的回信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Dr Howell has undertaken some excellent work on the mechanisms of action for cranberries and urinary tract infections (UITs) and she raises some interesting points in her commentary. However I must dispute some of the assertions she makes.Dr Howell argues that Cochrane reviews have been used to evaluate drug therapies, but they may not be the most effective way to review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of food products. Cochrane methods are primarily designed to systematically search, identify, quality assess and synthesise RCTs of a range of interventions.
机译:Howell博士在蔓越莓和尿路感染(UITs)的作用机理方面进行了出色的研究,她在评论中提出了一些有趣的观点。但是,我必须对她提出的一些主张提出异议。豪厄尔博士认为Cochrane审查已用于评估药物疗法,但它们可能不是审查食品随机对照试验(RCT)的最有效方法。 Cochrane方法的主要目的是系统地搜索,识别,质量评估和综合一系列干预措施的RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号