首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from local public libraries
【24h】

Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from local public libraries

机译:市民共同生产和有效的公共物品提供:地方公共图书馆的理论和证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In both public administration and economics, efficiency is brought forward as an important criterion for evaluating administrative actions. Clearly, its value as an assessment principle depends on our ability to adequately measure efficiency. This article argues that citizen's coproduction in public services requires a careful reassessment of how we approach the measurement of productive efficiency in public service delivery. Theoretically, we illustrate that using observable outcomes (e.g.; library circulation, school results, health outcomes, fires extinguished, and crimes solved) as output indicators is inappropriate and leads to biased estimates of public service providers' productive efficiency. This bias arises because citizens co-determine final outputs, leaving them at least partly beyond the service providers' control. Empirically, we find supportive evidence of both the existence and importance of such 'demand-induced' bias.
机译:在公共行政和经济学领域,效率都是评估行政行为的重要标准。显然,其作为评估原则的价值取决于我们充分衡量效率的能力。本文认为,公民在公共服务中的联合生产需要对我们如何衡量公共服务提供中的生产效率进行仔细的重新评估。从理论上讲,我们说明将可观察到的结果(例如图书馆流通,学校结果,健康结果,火灾扑灭和犯罪得以解决)用作产出指标是不合适的,并且会导致对公共服务提供者生产效率的估计偏差。之所以会产生这种偏见,是因为公民共同决定了最终产出,从而使他们至少部分超出了服务提供商的控制范围。从经验上,我们发现这种“需求诱发”偏见的存在和重要性的支持证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号