首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal >Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection results in improved clinical outcomes in couples with previous ICSI failures or male factor infertility: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection results in improved clinical outcomes in couples with previous ICSI failures or male factor infertility: a meta-analysis

机译:胞浆内形态学选择的精子注射与先前的ICSI失败或男性因素不育症相结合可改善临床疗效:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study was to perform the first meta-analysis to compare conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes and intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) outcomes in couples with previous ICSI failures (IF) or male factor infertility (MF). A systematic review was performed by searching Medline database to identify articles reporting on the comparison between ICSI and IMSI outcomes in couples with IF or MF. The main outcome measures were the implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates. Thirteen studies fulfilled our predetermined criteria. The overall results of meta-analysis for implantation (OR: 2.88; CI: 2.13-3.89), pregnancy (OR: 2.07; CI: 1.22-3.50) and miscarriage rates (OR: 0.31; CI: 0.14-0.67) were in favor of IMSI in couples with IF. Additionally, the overall result of meta-analysis for implantation (OR: 1.56; Cl: 1.11-2.18) and pregnancy rate (OR: 1.61; CI: 1.17-2.23) were in favor of IMSI in couples with MF. IMSI increases the odds of implantation by 50% and pregnancy by 60% in couples with MF. In light of improved clinical outcomes, we recommend promoting the IMSI method in couples with MF. Moreover, IMSI results in a 3-fold increase in implantation rate, a 2-fold increase in pregnancy rate and a 70% decrease in miscarriage rate as compared to ICSI in couples with IF, however, as no randomized evidence exists, randomized studies are needed to confirm the IMSI benefits in couples with IF. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是进行首次荟萃分析,以比较传统的胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)结果和胞浆内形态选择的精子注射(IMSI)结果与先前的ICSI失败(IF)或男性因素不育(MF)的夫妇。通过搜索Medline数据库进行系统评价,以鉴定报道IF或MF夫妇的ICSI和IMSI结果之间比较的文章。主要的预后指标是着床率,妊娠率和流产率。十三项研究符合我们的预定标准。接受荟萃分析的总体结果(OR:2.88; CI:2.13-3.89),妊娠(OR:2.07; CI:1.22-3.50)和流产率(OR:0.31; CI:0.14-0.67)与IF结合使用IMSI。此外,荟萃分析的整体植入结果(OR:1.56; Cl:1.11-2.18)和妊娠率(OR:1.61; CI:1.17-2.23)均支持IMSI。 IMSI使患有MF的夫妇的植入几率增加50%,怀孕的几率增加60%。考虑到改善的临床结果,我们建议在MF夫妇中推广IMSI方法。而且,与IFS夫妇相比,IMSI导致与ICSI相比,植入率提高了3倍,妊娠率提高了2倍,流产率降低了70%,但是,由于没有随机证据,所以进行了随机研究需要确认与IF结合使用IMSI的好处。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号