首页> 外文期刊>Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz >Rights of the child, parents' rights, and state monitoring. When is state intervention in parental autonomy permissible?
【24h】

Rights of the child, parents' rights, and state monitoring. When is state intervention in parental autonomy permissible?

机译:儿童的权利,父母的权利和国家监督。国家何时可以允许父母自治?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Children have their own rights from the outset. It is primarily their parents who are responsible for the implementation of these rights. But state instances also carry responsibility for child rights. The state should only intervene in the parental autonomy against the will of the parents when a child's well-being is endangered. The subject under investigation is whether the development of Fruhe Hilfen may have led to a subtle bringing forward of the threshold to state intervention, and how this should be assessed from the perspective of the rights of the child. The relevant legal and sociological literature is surveyed and evaluated with this question in mind. Findings indicate that there has been no change in the threshold to state intervention on a legal level. However, there are obvious signs that with the application of existing norms, more than before, the state no longer waits to intervene until actual harm has been done to a child, but already does so when there is a concrete threat to the child's well-being. The discussion shows that from the rights of the child perspective there is no existing reason to bring forward the threshold to state intervention in the parental autonomy. However, there is need for improvement in regard to specialist as well as legal measures. It is suggested that an approach based on the child's rights should be established across all professional fields, the child's position in various points of social law, and the rights of the child anchored in constitutional law.
机译:儿童从一开始就拥有自己的权利。这些权利的实施主要由父母负责。但是州立法院也对儿童权利负有责任。只有在儿童的健康受到威胁时,国家才应违反父母的意愿干预父母的自主权。正在调查的主题是,弗鲁厄·希尔芬(Fruhe Hilfen)的发展是否可能导致国家干预的门槛的微妙提高,以及应如何从儿童权利的角度对其进行评估。考虑到这个问题,对相关的法律和社会学文献进行了调查和评估。调查结果表明,在法律层面上对国家干预的门槛没有变化。但是,有明显的迹象表明,与以前相比,在应用现有准则的情况下,国家不再等到对儿童造成实际伤害之前就进行干预,但是当对儿童的健康构成具体威胁时,国家已经这样做了。存在。讨论表明,从儿童权利的角度来看,没有理由提出国家干预父母自治的门槛。但是,需要在专家和法律措施方面进行改进。建议在所有专业领域中建立一种基于儿童权利的方法,在社会法各个方面确定儿童的地位,并在宪法中确立儿童权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号