首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical endocrinology and diabetes: Official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association >Surveillance of TSH-suppressive levothyroxine treatment in thyroid cancer patients: TRH testing versus basal TSH determination by a third generation assay.
【24h】

Surveillance of TSH-suppressive levothyroxine treatment in thyroid cancer patients: TRH testing versus basal TSH determination by a third generation assay.

机译:甲状腺癌患者中TSH抑制性甲状腺素治疗的监测:TRH检测与通过第三代测定法测定基础TSH的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE, DESIGN AND METHODS: Although TRH testing has been eliminated in the diagnosis of most benign thyroid diseases, it is still controversial whether or not it can be replaced by ultrasensitive determination of basal TSH for monitoring optimal TSH suppression in thyroid cancer patients. We compared basal and TRH-stimulated TSH values measured by a 2 nd generation assay (lower detection limit 0.1 mU/l) and by a 3 rd generation assay (lower detection limit 0.005 mU/l) in 209 thyroidectomized thyroid cancer patients under suppressive levothyroxine treatment. RESULTS: In the 2 nd generation assay all patients had basal TSH values < 0.1 mU/l (criterion of admission in the study), and the TRH-stimulated TSH values were above the lower detection limit in 47% of the patients (range < 0.1-1.0 mU/l). In the 3 rd generation assay TSH was above the lower detection limit in 67% under basal conditions (range < 0.005-0.098 mU/l), and in 83% after TRH stimulation (range < 0.005-1.000 mU/l). We observed close correlations (p < 0.001) between basal and TRH-stimulated TSH in the 3 rd generation assay (r = 0.86), between TRH-stimulated TSH in the 2 nd and 3 rd generation assay (r = 0.95), and between TRH-stimulated TSH in the 2 nd generation assay and basal TSH in the 3 rd generation assay (r = 0.73). The ratio between TRH-stimulated and basal TSH values was in the average range 7-9 : 1. Subdividing the patients in three subgroups based on the TRH-stimulated TSH values from the 2 nd generation assay, the corresponding basal TSH values (median and [25.-75. percentile]) from the 3 rd generation assay were < 0.005 [< 0.005-0.010] mU/l in subgroup A (2 nd generation stim. TSH: < 0.15 mU/l), 0.032 [0.021-0.040] mU/l in subgroup B (2 nd generation stim. TSH: 0.15-0.4 mU/l), and 0.066 [0.046-0.085] mU/l in subgroup C (2 nd generation stim. TSH: > or = 0.5 mU/l). CONCLUSIONS: Even in those thyroid cancer patients where a high degree of TSH suppression is the therapeutic goal, 3 rd generation TSH assays enable a reliable adjustment of the levothyroxine dose by basal TSH determinations. In laboratories still using 2 nd generation assays, the monitoring of maximal TSH suppression in patients with high-risk thyroid cancer should be performed by TRH testing.
机译:目的,设计和方法:尽管在大多数良性甲状腺疾病的诊断中已取消了TRH检测,但是是否可以用超敏测定基础TSH来代替它来监测甲状腺癌患者的最佳TSH抑制作用仍存在争议。我们比较了在209例甲状腺切除的甲状腺癌患者中,在第2代测定法(检测下限下限0.1 mU / l)和第3代测定法(检测下限下限0.005 mU / l)下测量的基础和TRH刺激的TSH值治疗。结果:在第二代检测中,所有患者的基础TSH值均<0.1 mU / l(本研究的入院标准),并且TRH刺激的TSH值高于47%的患者的检测下限(范围< 0.1-1.0 mU / l)。在第三代测定中,TSH在基础条件下为67%(范围<0.005-0.098 mU / l),在TRH刺激后为83%(范围<0.005-1.000 mU / l)高于检测下限。我们在第3代测定中观察到基础和TRH刺激的TSH之间存在紧密相关性(p <0.001)(r = 0.86),在第2代和第3代测定中TRH刺激的TSH之间存在密切相关性(r = 0.95),并且在第二代测定中用TRH刺激的TSH,在第三代测定中用基础TSH刺激(​​r = 0.73)。 TRH刺激的基础TSH值与基础TSH值之间的比率在7-9:1的平均范围内。根据第二代检测中TRH刺激的TSH值将患者分为三个亚组,相应的基础TSH值(中位数和第3代分析得出的[25.-75。百分位数]为<0.005 [<0.005-0.010] mU / l,亚组A(第2代刺激的TSH:<0.15 mU / l),0.032 [0.021-0.040 B组中的mU / l(第二代刺激物TSH:0.15-0.4 mU / l),C组中B中的0.066 [0.046-0.085] mU / l(第二代刺激物TSH:>或= 0.5 mU / l)。结论:即使在那些以高度TSH抑制为治疗目标的甲状腺癌患者中,第三代TSH检测也可以通过基础TSH测定可靠地调整左甲状腺素剂量。在仍使用第2代测定法的实验室中,应通过TRH检测对高危甲状腺癌患者中最大TSH抑制量进行监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号