首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Planning Control on the Northern European Periphery
【24h】

Planning Control on the Northern European Periphery

机译:北欧外围地区的规划控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

From different pasts and currently different connections to EU, Latvia and Norway in the last few years have created new legal frameworks for their national planning systems and hence for planning control. This paper explores similarities and differences between these two planning control systems and related tendencies in the revision of planning legislation adopted in recent times. Methodologically, the study makes a distinction between acting organizational subjects and the rules of the game that affect their performance. Together with the planning organization, such formal institutional factors indicate modes of planning control as well as possibilities for creating coherence across planning hierarchies. The conclusion indicates similarities between the two systems, but also differences. These apply to some extent to organization, responsibilities and contents of planning control on regional and national levels and especially to their respective institutional approaches for creating consistency and symmetry in planning across local, regional and national levels. The recent legal revisions do not indicate any kind of tendency for convergence between these planning control systems. On the contrary, some of these changes reveal different approaches to modes of planning control.
机译:在过去的几年中,由于过去和现在与欧盟,拉脱维亚和挪威的联系不同,它们为其国家规划系统以及规划控制建立了新的法律框架。本文探讨了这两种计划控制系统之间的异同以及在最近通过的计划立法修订中的相关趋势。从方法上讲,该研究将行动组织主体与影响其绩效的游戏规则区分开来。与计划组织一起,这种正式的制度因素表明了计划控制的模式以及在整个计划层次结构中建立一致性的可能性。结论表明两个系统之间的相似之处,但也有差异。这些在某种程度上适用于区域和国家层面的计划控制的组织,职责和内容,尤其适用于它们各自的机构方法,以在地方,区域和国家层面上实现计划的一致性和对称性。最近的法律修订版并未表明这些计划控制系统之间趋于融合的任何趋势。相反,其中一些变化揭示了计划控制模式的不同方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号