首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Botanical Survey of India >PHYLETIC VERSUS PHENETIC APPROACH OF CLASSIFICATION: A CASE STUDY FROM FAMILY EUPHORBIACEAE
【24h】

PHYLETIC VERSUS PHENETIC APPROACH OF CLASSIFICATION: A CASE STUDY FROM FAMILY EUPHORBIACEAE

机译:物理对物理的分类方法:以家庭大虾科为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Phenetic as well as Phyletic, are both objective classifications, but are based on different dicta. One is based on overall similarities, and other on evolutionary characters. It is a matter of arguments, which one is more predictive and natural. Sometaxa of Euphorbiaceae have been taken as example to see, which one is better. One of the basic aim of classification is to produce a more natural and predictive classification which is based on more characters. These general purpose classifications aregood for most purposes, and they are reasonably represented by the familiar sequences of families, genera and species etc. which appear in Flora. There are situations when predictivity is not the only requirement, it is the relationship of a group of thetaxa. Theoretically Phylogenetic classifications can be considered as less natural than Phenetic ones, since they are based on only few but phylogenetically important characters. From a long time it is a matter of arguments whether phenetic or phyleticclassifications are more predictive and natural. What difference lies between classifications erected according to the two stand point, and investigating the reasons for and consequences of any difference found.
机译:物性和物性都是客观分类,但基于不同的用法。一种基于总体相似性,另一种基于进化特征。这是一个争论的问题,哪个更具有预测性和自然性。以大戟科的一些紫杉类为例进行观察,哪个更好。分类的基本目的之一是基于更多字符产生更自然,更具预测性的分类。这些通用分类对大多数目的都有好处,并且可以通过植物区系中常见的科,属和物种等序列合理地表示。在某些情况下,可预测性不是唯一的要求,它是一组分类单元的关系。从理论上讲,系统发育分类不如自然现象分类自然,因为它们仅基于少数几个但在系统发育上很重要的特征。长期以来,对于表象分类还是系统分类是否更具预测性和自然性一直是一个争论的问题。根据这两种观点建立的分类之间的区别是什么,以及调查发现任何区别的原因和后果之间的区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号