首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >The prognostic performance of the predisposition, infection, response and organ failure (PIRO) classification in high-risk and low-risk emergency department sepsis populations: comparison with clinical judgement and sepsis category.
【24h】

The prognostic performance of the predisposition, infection, response and organ failure (PIRO) classification in high-risk and low-risk emergency department sepsis populations: comparison with clinical judgement and sepsis category.

机译:高危和低危急诊脓毒症人群的易感性,感染,反应和器官衰竭(PIRO)分类的预后表现:与临床判断和败血症类别进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The accuracy and discriminative performance of the PIRO score and clinical judgement are similar, but better than the sepsis category. Prognostic performance of illness severity scores is less in high-risk cohorts, while in high-risk populations a risk stratification tool would be most useful.
机译:PIRO评分的准确性和判别性能与临床判断相似,但优于败血症类别。高危人群的疾病严重程度评分的预后表现较低,而在高危人群中,风险分层工具将是最有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号