首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Delphi based consensus study into planning for chemical incidents.
【24h】

Delphi based consensus study into planning for chemical incidents.

机译:基于Delphi的共识研究可用于化学事故的计划。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To achieve consensus in all phases of chemical incident planning and response. DESIGN: A three round Delphi study was conducted using a panel of 39 experts from specialties involved in the management of chemical incidents. Areas that did not reach consensus in the Delphi study were presented as synopsis statements for discussion in four syndicate groups at a conference hosted by the Department of Health Emergency Planning Co-ordination Unit. RESULTS: A total of 183 of 322 statements had reached consensus upon completion of the Delphi study. This represented 56.8% of the total number of statements. Of these, 148 reached consensus at >94% and 35 reached consensus at >89%. The results of the process are presented as a series of synopsis consensus statements that cover all phases of chemical incident planning and response. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a Delphi study and subsequent syndicate group discussions achieved consensus in aspects of all phases of chemical incident planning and response that can be translated into practical guidance for use at regional prehospital and hospital level. Additionally, areas of non-consensus have been identified where further work is required.
机译:目的:在化学事故的计划和响应的所有阶段达成共识。设计:由来自化学事故管理的39名专家组成的小组进行了三轮Delphi研究。在卫生部紧急计划协调部主办的会议上,德尔福研究中未达成共识的领域以提要陈述的形式提出,供四个集团讨论。结果:完成Delphi研究后,共有322条陈述中的183条达成了共识。这占陈述总数的56.8%。其中,有148个达成共识的> 94%,有35个达成共识的> 89%。该过程的结果以一系列概要共识声明的形式出现,涵盖了化学事故规划和响应的所有阶段。结论:使用德尔福研究和随后的辛迪加小组讨论在化学事故规划和响应的所有阶段都达成了共识,可以将其转化为在地区院前和医院一级使用的实用指南。此外,在需要进一步工作的地方,已经确定了不一致的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号