...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >A randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of double Tubigrip in grade 1 and 2 (mild to moderate) ankle sprains.
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of double Tubigrip in grade 1 and 2 (mild to moderate) ankle sprains.

机译:一项随机对照试验,确定双图比格利普在1级和2级(轻度至中度)踝关节扭伤中的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcome in patients with acute grade 1 or 2 (mild to moderate) lateral ankle sprains randomised to treatment with or without a double tubigrip bandage (DTG). METHODS: 400 patients presenting to the accident and emergency (A&E) departments of a teaching hospital and a district general hospital and diagnosed with grade 1 or 2 lateral ankle sprains were randomised to treatment with or without a DTG bandage. A standardised telephone questionnaire was performed one week after presentation. The main outcome measures were: number of days until walking unaided, number of days off work, whether the injury kept the patient awake at night, whether analgesia was taken. RESULTS: 197 of 400 patients completed follow up. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex and occupation between the treatment groups. There were no significant differences between those who did and those who did not complete follow up. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for number of days until walking unaided (95% CI -0.21 to 0.88 days), number of days off work (95% CI -0.70 to 1.02 days) or whether the injury kept the patient awake at night (95% CI -10 to 17%). There was a significant difference between the groups in the use of analgesia (95% CI 10 to 36%); the difference seemed to be that patients treated with DTG required significantly more analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of grade 1 and 2 ankle sprins with DTG does not seem to lead to a shorter time to functional recovery and may increase the requirement for analgesia.
机译:目的:比较随机分为两组的急性1级或2级(轻度至中度)外侧踝扭伤的患者的功能预后,该患者随机接受或不接受双曲折绷带(DTG)治疗。方法:将400例就诊于教学医院和地区综合医院急诊(A&E)部门且被诊断为1级或2级外侧踝扭伤的患者随机分为接受或不接受DTG绷带治疗的患者。演示后一周进行一次标准电话调查表。主要的结局指标是:无人行走前的天数,下班天数,受伤是否使患者在夜间保持清醒,是否使用了镇痛药。结果:400名患者中的197名完成了随访。治疗组之间在年龄,性别和职业方面无显着差异。进行跟进与未完成跟进之间没有显着差异。两组之间的差异无显着性:在无人行走之前的天数(95%CI -0.21至0.88天),下班天数(95%CI -0.70至1.02天)或损伤是否使患者保持清醒在夜间(95%CI -10至17%)。两组之间在使用镇痛方面有显着差异(95%CI为10%到36%);差异似乎是接受DTG治疗的患者需要明显更多的镇痛作用。结论:用DTG治疗1级和2级踝关节骨折似乎并不能缩短功能恢复的时间,并且可能会增加镇痛的需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号