首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >Reply to the Letter to the Editor of J. Padulo et al. concerning 'Calculation of corrected body height in idiopathic scoliosis:-comparison of four methods' by M, Tyrakowski et al. (Eur Spine J, ^i>10.1007/s00586-014-3275-l)
【24h】

Reply to the Letter to the Editor of J. Padulo et al. concerning 'Calculation of corrected body height in idiopathic scoliosis:-comparison of four methods' by M, Tyrakowski et al. (Eur Spine J, ^i>10.1007/s00586-014-3275-l)

机译:回复给J. Padulo等人的编辑的信。 M,Tyrakowski等人关于“在特发性脊柱侧凸中校正身高的计算:-四种方法的比较”。 (Eur Spine J,^ i> 10.1007 / s00586-014-3275-l)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We are glad that the authors of the Letter to the Editor found the topic of calculating the true body height in patients with scoliosis to be interesting and requiring research. With this response we thank the authors of the letter for pointing methodological inconsistencies of our study [1].; We agree that other statistical methods should have been used [2-6], so we repeated the analysis using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the median error for a single measurement (SEM), and obtained substantially similar results. There was an insufficient overall agreement between all the methods tested with the ICC of 0.66 and SEM of 5 mm. Comparison of pairs of the methods is presented in Table 1.
机译:我们很高兴看到《致编辑的信》的作者发现计算脊柱侧弯患者真实身高的话题很有趣并且需要研究。有了这个答复,我们感谢这封信的作者指出了我们研究的方法学不一致之处[1]。我们同意应该使用其他统计方法[2-6],因此我们使用类内相关系数(ICC)和单次测量的中位数误差(SEM)重复了分析,并获得了基本相似的结果。使用ICC为0.66和SEM为5 mm的所有测试方法之间的总体一致性不足。表1列出了两种方法的比较。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号