...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine Australasia: EMA >Ultrasound use in Australasian emergency departments: A survey of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Fellows and Trainees
【24h】

Ultrasound use in Australasian emergency departments: A survey of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Fellows and Trainees

机译:澳洲急诊科使用超声波:澳洲急诊医学研究员和学员的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To describe current practice of EDUS by ACEM Trainees and Fellows; to describe potential barriers to US use in the Australasian setting; to determine compliance with current college guidelines regarding US credentialing. Methods: Data were collected by a cross-sectional online survey. Respondents were Trainees and Fellows of the ACEM. Outcome measures included the percentage of respondents currently undergoing or that had completed US credentialing for Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) scans. The perceived barriers to use of emergency US were explored. Results: There were 512 survey respondents, giving an overall response rate of 15%. Fellows were more likely to be credentialed compared with Trainees. There were 61% of respondents not credentialed for FAST and assessment of AAA scans. However, a significant proportion performed these scans regularly, and did not routinely seek independent confirmation of their findings. Barriers to credentialing included limited time and no credentialing programme at the individual's hospital. Conclusions: The present study showed that only a minority of ACEM Trainees and Fellows are credentialed to perform routine ED scans. Many non-credentialed ACEM Trainees and Fellows are performing scans, many without independent confirmation of their findings.
机译:目的:描述ACEM学员和研究员对EDUS的当前实践;描述美国在澳大利亚环境中使用的潜在障碍;确定是否符合当前有关美国认证的大学准则。方法:通过横断面在线调查收集数据。受访者是ACEM的学员和研究员。结果指标包括当前正在接受或已经完成美国创伤声像集中评估(FAST)和腹主动脉瘤(AAA)扫描评估的美国受访者所占的百分比。探索了使用紧急美国的感知障碍。结果:共有512名调查受访者,总体答复率为15%。与学员相比,研究员更有资格获得证书。有61%的受访者没有FAST和AAA扫描评估的资格。但是,很大一部分人定期进行这些扫描,并且没有常规寻求对其结果的独立确认。认证的障碍包括时间有限,个人医院没有认证程序。结论:本研究表明,只有少数ACEM学员和研究员具有执行常规ED扫描的资格。许多非凭证式ACEM培训生和研究员正在执行扫描,其中许多未独立确认其发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号