首页> 外文期刊>Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution >Shift in diversification in sister-clade comparisons: A more powerful test
【24h】

Shift in diversification in sister-clade comparisons: A more powerful test

机译:姐妹比较中的多元化转变:更强大的检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tests of shift in diversification associated with key innovations or directional environmental change can be performed with sister-clade comparisons. This approach is attractive because it does not require detailed phylogenetic information. I propose a new likelihood ratio test based on fitting two models of diversification. I show how this test differs from a previous likelihood ratio test based on the geometric distribution. With simulations from a wide range of situations, I show that the new test performs much better than this test and the traditional test by Slowinski and Guyer. The proposed test performs at least as well as the species richness contrast test that has been proposed by several authors in four versions. A power analysis with low number of pairs of sister clades showed that the new test could detect a shift in diversification with five or less pairs of sister clades, whereas the diversity contrast test cannot detect any shift in this situation. The former appears as more powerful than the latter, and therefore is recommended when the number of pairs of sister clades is low (less than 10). All other tests should not be used as the present study showed they lack statistical power and robustness.
机译:可以通过姐妹比较来进行与关键创新或方向性环境变化相关的多元化变化的测试。这种方法很有吸引力,因为它不需要详细的系统发育信息。我提出了一种新的似然比检验,该检验基于对两种多元化模型的拟合。我将说明此测试与基于几何分布的先前似然比测试有何不同。通过对各种情况的仿真,我证明了新测试的性能要比Slowinski和Guyer的传统测试好得多。提议的测试至少执行与几位作者在四个版本中提出的物种丰富度对比测试。对配对姐妹数少的功效分析表明,新测试可以检测五对或更少配对姐妹数对的多样化变化,而多样性对比测试在这种情况下无法检测到任何变化。前者似乎比后者更强大,因此,当姐妹进化枝对的数量较少(少于10)时,建议使用前者。不应使用所有其他测试,因为本研究表明它们缺乏统计能力和鲁棒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号