首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Editorial comment on: Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Editorial comment on: Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.

机译:编辑评论:Hol激光摘除术与经尿道前列腺切除术:一项随机临床试验的3年随访结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For many years open prostatectomy had been the primary treatment option in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) until it was gradually replaced by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Although TURP is still regarded as the gold standard in patients with BPH, it is associated with significant morbidity rates. In the last decade, therefore, various alternative treatment options such as holmium laser enuclea- tion of the prostate (HoLEP) and potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporisation of the prostate have been developed. Many of these have fallen into oblivion because of low efficacy, high costs, and long learning curves, but a substantial number of articles have suggested that HoLEP might succeed as a valuable treatment alternative.
机译:多年来,开放式前列腺切除术一直是良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的主要治疗选择,直到逐渐被前列腺经尿道切除术(TURP)替代。尽管TURP仍被视为BPH患者的黄金标准,但它与明显的发病率相关。因此,在最近的十年中,已开发出各种替代治疗方案,例如激光前列腺切除术(HoLEP)和前列腺素磷酸钾钛酸酯激光汽化。由于疗效低,成本高和学习时间长,其中许多方法被遗忘了,但是大量文章表明,HoLEP可能会成功地成为有价值的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号