...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery: official publication of the European Trauma Society >The Aachen Mobility and Balance Index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA Scale
【24h】

The Aachen Mobility and Balance Index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA Scale

机译:亚琛流动性和平衡指数来衡量生理性跌倒风险:与Tinetti POMA量表的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The most commonly used mobility assessments for screening risk of falls among older adults are rating scales such as the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). However, its correlation with falls is not always predictable and disadvantages of the scale include difficulty to assess many of the items on a 3-point scale and poor specificity. The purpose of this study was to describe the ability of the new Aachen Mobility and Balance Index (AMBI) to discriminate between subjects with a fall history and subjects without such events in comparison to the Tinetti POMA Scale.
机译:用于筛查老年人跌倒风险的最常用的流动性评估是评分量表,例如Tinetti绩效导向的流动性评估(POMA)。然而,其与跌倒的相关性并非总是可预测的,并且该量表的缺点包括难以以3点量表评估许多项目以及特异性差。这项研究的目的是与Tinetti POMA量表相比,描述新的亚琛移动和平衡指数(AMBI)区分具有跌倒病史的受试者和没有此类事件的受试者的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号