【24h】

ADHD: sibling interaction or dominance: an evaluation of statistical power.

机译:多动症:同胞互动或主导地位:对统计能力的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sibling interaction effects are suggested by a difference in phenotypic variance between monozygotic (MZ) twins and dizygotic (DZ) twins, and a pattern of twin correlations that is inconsistent with additive genetic influences. Notably, negative sibling interaction will result in MZ correlations which are more than twice as high as DZ correlations, a pattern also seen in the presence of genetic dominance. Negative sibling interaction effects have been reported in most genetic studies on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and related phenotypes, while the presence of genetic dominance is not always considered in these studies. In the present paper the statistical power to detect both negative sibling interaction effects and genetic dominance is explored. Power calculations are presented for univariate models including sources of variation due to additive genetic influences, unique environmental influences, dominant genetic influences and a negative sibling interaction (i.e., contrast effect) between phenotypes of twins. Parameter values for heritability and contrast effects are chosen in accordance with published behavior genetic studies on ADHD and associated phenotypes. Results show that when both genetic dominance and contrast effects are truly present and using a classical twin design, genetic dominance is more likely to go undetected than the contrast effect. Failure to detect the presence of genetic dominance consequently gives rise to slightly biased estimates of additive genetic effects, unique environmental effects, and the contrast effect. Contrast effects are more easily detected in the absence of genetic dominance. If the significance of the contrast effect is evaluated while also including genetic dominance, small contrast effects are likely to go undetected, resulting in a relatively large bias in estimates of the other parameters. Alternative genetic designs, such as adding pairs of unrelated siblings reared together to a classical twin design, or adding non-twin siblings to twin pairs, greatly enhances the statistical power to detect contrast effects as well as the power to distinguish between genetic dominance and contrast effects.
机译:单卵(MZ)双胞胎和双卵(DZ)双胞胎之间的表型差异以及与加性遗传影响不一致的双胞胎相关模式提示同胞相互作用效应。值得注意的是,同级的负向相互作用将导致MZ相关性比DZ相关性高两倍以上,这种模式在存在遗传优势时也可以看到。在大多数关于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和相关表型的遗传研究中,已经报道了同级相互作用的负面影响,而在这些研究中并不总是考虑遗传优势的存在。在本文中,探索了同时检测负面同胞交互作用和遗传优势的统计能力。提出了针对单变量模型的功效计算,包括由于双生子表型之间的累加遗传影响,独特的环境影响,显性遗传影响以及同胞之间的负面兄弟姐妹相互作用(即对比效应)引起的变异源。根据公开的关于ADHD和相关表型的行为遗传研究,选择遗传力和对比效应的参数值。结果表明,当遗传优势和对比效应同时存在并使用经典双胞胎设计时,遗传优势比对比效应更容易被发现。因此,未能检测到遗传优势的存在会导致对附加遗传效应,独特的环境效应和对比效应的估计略有偏差。在没有遗传优势的情况下,对比效果更容易检测到。如果在评估对比效果的重要性的同时还包括遗传优势,那么可能不会检测到较小的对比效果,从而导致其他参数的估计值存在较大偏差。替代的遗传设计,例如将成对的不相关兄弟姐妹添加到经典双胞胎设计中,或将非双胞胎兄弟姐妹添加到双胞胎对中,极大地增强了检测对比效应的统计能力以及区分遗传优势和对比的能力效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号