...
首页> 外文期刊>European Food and Feed Law Review >Never-ending Debate on Food Supplements: Harmonisation or Disharmonisation of the Law?
【24h】

Never-ending Debate on Food Supplements: Harmonisation or Disharmonisation of the Law?

机译:关于食品补充剂的永无止境的辩论:法律的协调还是不统一?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The European Union was for many years troubled by issues related to marketing food supplements, with different qualifications of products in different countries impeding the free movement of these goods within the EU market. Ever since Directive 2002/46/EC was adopted a heated debate has been continuing regarding the marketing of these products. In view of numerous legal lapses in this area, new decisions of the European Court of Justice are presented to interpret the provisions of food law and pharmaceutical law. The present Article provides an overview of the legal provisions regarding food supplements and its interpretation, including the difficulties with the application of these rules in the legal practice; with specific regard not only to theCommunity law but also to Polish law regarding food supplements.
机译:多年来,欧盟一直受到与食品补充剂营销有关的问题的困扰,不同国家产品的不同资格阻碍了这些产品在欧盟市场内的自由流通。自从通过了2002/46 / EC指令以来,关于这些产品的营销一直在进行激烈的辩论。鉴于该领域的许多法律失误,提出了欧洲法院的新判决,以解释食品法和药品法的规定。本条概述了有关食品补充剂的法律规定及其解释,包括在法律实践中难以应用这些规则的情况;不仅要特别注意《社区法》,还要特别注意关于食品补充剂的波兰法律。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号