首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >National identification, type and specificity of comparison and their effects on descriptions of national character
【24h】

National identification, type and specificity of comparison and their effects on descriptions of national character

机译:比较的国家识别,类型和特殊性及其对民族特征描述的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Studies conducted in Britain (n = 88) and Germany (n = 128) used a questionnaire with an experimental manipulation to examine the effects of national identification, type of comparison (intergroup or temporal) and specificity of comparison (specific or non-specific) on trait descriptions of national identity. Both differentiation between the subject and object of comparison and the absolute stereotype of the national ingroup (i.e. the national autostereotype) were measured. Regression analyses found that high identification was associated with greater ingroup bias and an overall more positive autostereotype; that specific temporal comparison with a shameful past (slavery for the British and the Nazi era for the German sample) predicted greater differentiation from the present than nonspecific comparisons with 'the past' in general; and that specific comparisons with the Americans or a shameful history precipitated greater differentiation and (in the British sample) a departure of the autostereotype from a control condition that entailed no comparison. We argue that our approach can contribute to a more holistic social identity analysis of nationality. Future research should distinguish the effects of context from those of identification, show an awareness of the potential differences between specific and non-specific comparisons, and examine a greater variety of temporal comparison targets. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:在英国(n = 88)和德国(n = 128)进行的研究使用了具有实验操纵性的问卷,以检验国民身分识别,比较类型(群体间或时间上)和比较特异性(特异性或非特异性)的影响关于民族身份的特征描述。比较对象和比较对象之间的差异以及全国同族的绝对刻板印象(即全国自动刻板印象)。回归分析发现,高度认同与更大的群体内偏见和总体上更积极的自定型有关。一般而言,与可耻的过去进行特定的时间比较(英国样本为奴隶制,德国为纳粹时代),与目前的“过去”进行非特定比较相比,与当前的差异更大;与美国人的特定比较或可耻的历史引发了更大的分化,并且(在英国样本中)自动定型与对照条件的偏离(无对照)。我们认为我们的方法可以有助于对国籍进行更全面的社会身份分析。未来的研究应该将上下文的影响与识别的影响区分开,显示出对特定和非特定比较之间潜在差异的认识,并研究更多的时间比较目标。版权所有(c)2006 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号