首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context
【24h】

New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context

机译:新西兰=双重文化?新西兰背景下种族与民族之间的隐式和显式关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Four studies examined explicit and implicit perceptions of ethnicity and nationhood in New Zealand (NZ). NZ Europeans/Pakeha (the majority group) endorsed a bicultural perspective and explicitly rated both their own ingroup and Maori (the indigenous peoples of NZ) as contributing equally to NZ national identity and culture (Study 1). Contrary to the divergence between explicit and implicit ethnic-national associations observed in the USA, implicit associations in NZ were generally consistent with explicitly stated values. Pakeha and Maori, but not Asian New Zealanders, were both strongly implicitly associated with the national category 'NZ' (Studies 1-3), although this general tendency was qualified by weak levels of ingroup favoritism from all three ethnic groups (Study 2). Finally, the small tendency for Pakeha to implicitly associate their ingroup more strongly with NZ was erased by using moderately well-known Pakeha and Maori rugby players as targets (Study 4). These findings contrast with the American = White implicit associations described by Devos and Banaji (2005), and provide insight into the ways in which socio-cultural realities foster convergence or divergence between explicit and implicit beliefs about equality and the function of ethnicity in nationhood. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:四项研究检查了新西兰(NZ)对种族和民族的明示和隐含的看法。新西兰欧洲人/ Pakeha(多数群体)赞同双重文化的观点,并明确评价他们自己的群体和毛利人(新西兰的土著人民)对新西兰的民族认同和文化做出了同等贡献(研究1)。与在美国观察到的显式和隐式民族协会之间的差异相反,在新西兰,隐式协会通常与显式声明的值一致。帕克哈(Pakeha)和毛利人(Maori),而不是亚洲新西兰人,都与国家类别“ NZ”密切相关(研究1-3),尽管这一总体趋势已被所有三个族群的弱势群体偏爱所证实(研究2)。 。最后,通过使用中度知名的Pakeha和毛利人橄榄球球员作为目标,消除了Pakeha将他们的团伙更紧密地与NZ关联的小趋势(研究4)。这些发现与Devos和Banaji(2005)描述的“美国=白色”隐性协会形成对比,并提供了对社会文化现实如何促进关于平等和民族功能的显性和隐性信念之间趋同或分歧的见解。版权所有(C)2007 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号