首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Reproductibility of apparent diffusion coefficients measurements in diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen with different b values
【24h】

Reproductibility of apparent diffusion coefficients measurements in diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen with different b values

机译:不同b值的腹部弥散加权MRI中表观弥散系数测量的可重复性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To test the reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) measurements of the normal liver, kidney and spleen parenchyma with different b values. Materials and methods: Eleven healthy volunteers were imaged twice with use of the same protocol. Each DWI was performed with b-factors of 0, 100 and 500 s/mm 2. The ADCs were organized according to session (1 or 2), anatomic location and repetition (twice with two different b value per session). The ADC data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance to demonstrate the influence of anatomic location, session and different b values. The coefficient of variation was calculated for each subject, b value and anatomic location, then analyzed by using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: There were significant differences in mean ADCs among the three anatomic locations and with different b values (P .05). There were no significant differences in ADCs between imaging sessions 1 or 2 for both b values (P .05). The CV values range between 7.3% and 14.7%. There were no significant differences in CV values neither between the two b values nor for the various organ locations (P .05). Conclusion: Using the same technical parameters, patients and the same observer, CV values range between 7.3% and 14.7%. And we recommend to be careful in examination and comparison of the measured ADC values, below these limits, without knowledge technical parameters that has been used, otherwise differences that are merely because of changes in the measurement technique could be interpreted as differences because of progression of disease or therapy.
机译:目的:测试具有不同b值的正常肝,肾和脾实质的表观扩散系数(ADC)测量值的可重复性。材料和方法:使用相同的方案对11名健康志愿者进行两次成像。每个DWI的b因子分别为0、100和500 s / mm2。ADC是根据会话(1或2),解剖位置和重复(每个会话两次,具有两个不同的b值)进行组织的。使用重复测量方差分析对ADC数据进行分析,以证明解剖位置,疗程和不同b值的影响。计算每个受试者的变异系数,b值和解剖位置,然后使用重复测量方差分析进行分析。结果:三个解剖位置之间的平均ADC差异显着,且b值不同(P <.05)。对于两个b值,在成像会话1或2之间的ADC之间无显着差异(P> .05)。 CV值介于7.3%和14.7%之间。两个b值之间以及各个器官位置的CV值均无显着差异(P> .05)。结论:使用相同的技术参数,患者和相同的观察者,CV值在7.3%和14.7%之间。并且我们建议在检查和比较低于这些限制的ADC值时要格外小心,不要使用已知的技术参数,否则仅由于测量技术的变化而引起的差异就可以解释为由于测量技术的进步而引起的差异。疾病或疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号