首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Haematology >Sensitivity and specificity of Single-Tube Osmotic Fragility Test and its different methods as screening test for thalassemia trait: an alternative to expensive laboratory tests for resource-limited countries
【24h】

Sensitivity and specificity of Single-Tube Osmotic Fragility Test and its different methods as screening test for thalassemia trait: an alternative to expensive laboratory tests for resource-limited countries

机译:单管渗透性脆性试验的敏感性和特异性及其作为地中海贫血性状筛查试验的不同方法:对于资源有限的国家而言,可以替代昂贵的实验室试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of single-tube osmotic fragility (SOFT) and its different methods as screening test for thalassemia trait. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Omair Sana Foundation. A total of 400 participants were included in the study. Three hundred were known thalassemia carriers (parents with at least one child with thalassemia major), while 100 were healthy blood donors. SOFT was performed on all 400 participants. Serum iron, ferritin, and DNA tests were performed on 100 participants (donors). ARMS technique was used for detecting thalassemia mutations. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of SOFT (venous method) were found to be 99.6% and 86%, respectively, while with EDTA method, sensitivity was 95% and specificity was 96%. For venous and EDTA methods, positive predictive values were 95.5% and 98.6%, respectively, while negative predictive values were 98.8% and 86.6%, respectively. Use of EDTA and storage had an effect on the results. Sensitivity of SOFT was 95% at 5 min, while it decreased to 87% with EDTA method at 240 min. Sensitivity of SOFT for iron deficiency anemia was found to be 14%. Conclusion: SOFT can be used as screening test for thalassemia trait in a cost-effective way. Moreover, we also found that SOFT should be performed on venous blood without adding preservatives (EDTA) that can interfere with the results.
机译:目的:确定单管渗透性脆性(SOFT)及其不同方法作为地中海贫血性状筛查试验的敏感性和特异性。方法:在Omair Sana基金会进行了横断面研究。该研究总共包括400名参与者。 300名已知的地中海贫血携带者(父母中至少有一名患有地中海贫血的儿童),而100名健康献血者。对所有400位参与者进行了SOFT。对100名参与者(捐赠者)进行了血清铁,铁蛋白和DNA测试。 ARMS技术用于检测地中海贫血突变。结果:SOFT(静脉法)的敏感性和特异性分别为99.6%和86%,而EDTA法的敏感性为95%,特异性为96%。对于静脉和EDTA方法,阳性预测值分别为95.5%和98.6%,而阴性预测值分别为98.8%和86.6%。 EDTA的使用和储存对结果有影响。 5分钟时SOFT的灵敏度为95%,而EDTA方法在240分钟时的灵敏度降至87%。发现SOFT对缺铁性贫血的敏感性为14%。结论:SOFT可以作为一种经济有效的方法来筛查地中海贫血的特征。此外,我们还发现SOFT应该在静脉血上进行,而无需添加会干扰结果的防腐剂(EDTA)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号