首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Local and distant acupuncture points stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review on the comparative effects
【24h】

Local and distant acupuncture points stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review on the comparative effects

机译:局部和远处穴位刺激治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛:比较效果的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One in four people suffers from chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Acupuncture points stimulation is increasingly used for pain relief for CMP. Commonly, a combination of local and distant points is used. However, the difference between the effects of local and distant point stimulation is unknown. This systematic review aimed to determine if there was a difference in effects between stimulating local and distant points, and the combination of both when compared with either alone. English and Chinese electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials, where local or distant points were stimulated in adults with CMP. Pain intensity was the primary outcome measure. Nineteen were included in the qualitative analysis and 15 in the meta-analysis. Local and distant point stimulation was more effective than their respective controls in pain reduction immediately after treatment. Three studies directly compared the stimulation of local and distant points and found no significant difference between the two. No studies compared combined local and distant point stimulation with either alone. Subgroup analyses showed that, local tender point stimulation was more effective than local acupuncture points. Local and distant point stimulation induces similar degree of acupuncture analgesia. The benefit of combining local and distant point stimulation is unknown. However, subgroup analyses suggested that local tender points could be important in the treatment of CMP for short-term pain relief.
机译:四分之一的人患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)。穴位刺激越来越多地用于CMP的止痛。通常,使用本地和遥远点的组合。但是,局部和远处刺激的效果之间的差异是未知的。这项系统的审查旨在确定刺激局部和远处的点之间的效果是否存在差异,以及与单独比较时两者的组合是否存在差异。搜索英语和中文电子数据库,以鉴定随机对照试验,其中在患有CMP的成年人中刺激局部或遥远点。疼痛强度是主要的结局指标。定性分析包括19个,荟萃分析包括15个。在治疗后,局部和远处刺激比其各自的对照在减轻疼痛方面更有效。三项研究直接比较了局部和远处点的刺激,发现两者之间没有显着差异。没有研究将局部和远处刺激与单独使用相结合。亚组分析显示,局部压痛点刺激比局部穴位更有效。局部和远处的点刺激引起相似程度的针刺镇痛。结合局部和远处刺激的好处尚不清楚。但是,亚组分析表明,局部压痛点对于CMP的短期疼痛缓解可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号