...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical pharmacology >Pharmacological treatment of acute otitis media in children. A comparison among seven locations: Tenerife, Barcelona and Valencia (Spain), Toulouse (France), Smolensk (Russia), Bratislava (Slovakia) and Sofia (Bulgaria).
【24h】

Pharmacological treatment of acute otitis media in children. A comparison among seven locations: Tenerife, Barcelona and Valencia (Spain), Toulouse (France), Smolensk (Russia), Bratislava (Slovakia) and Sofia (Bulgaria).

机译:小儿急性中耳炎的药理治疗。七个地点之间的比较:特内里费岛,巴塞罗那和巴伦西亚(西班牙),图卢兹(法国),斯摩棱斯克(俄罗斯),布拉迪斯拉发(斯洛伐克)和索非亚(保加利亚)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns observed in the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) in several locations of five countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Random sample of 12,264 paediatric outpatients seen by paediatricians or general practitioners (GPs). Data on patient demographics, diagnoses and treatment were collected. Diagnoses were coded by ICD-9 and drugs by ATC classification. Patients diagnosed with AOM (ICD-9 codes: 381 and 382) were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Cases of AOM (873) accounted for 7.1% of the sample. There is a clear variation in the percentage of children diagnosed with AOM and treated with antibiotics in the different locations, antibiotic prescriptions being higher in Barcelona (93% of children), and lowest in Smolensk (56.4 % of children were treated without antibiotics). The antibiotics used varied widely: ampicillin use is almost limited to Smolensk (26.7%) and Bratislava (13.8%), whereas amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid is the choice in Toulouse (33.8%), Valencia (30.2%) and Barcelona (28.9%), and cephalosporins are more frequently prescribed in Tenerife (51.7%). Finally, macrolides are used in Barcelona (18.3%), Valencia (17.5%) and Tenerife (13.6%), but not prescribed in Toulouse or Sofia. Prescriptions of anti-inflammatory drugs were only relevant in Valencia (31.7%), Tenerife (27.2%) and Toulouse (17.4%) and of otological preparations in Sofia, where almost each child received ear drops (91.9%). Nasal preparations are commonly used only in Sofia (41.9%), Bratislava (65.5%) and Smolensk (68.6%). CONCLUSION: Despite the general agreement of most guidelines, wide differences in the treatment of uncomplicated AOM in children are observed. Non-antibiotic therapy for AOM and the use of first-choice antibiotics should be more actively encouraged in the primary care centres. Studies to measure prevailing rates of antibiotic resistance in these populations are needed.
机译:目的:描述在五个国家的几个地方治疗急性中耳炎(AOM)的方式。患者与方法:横断面描述性研究。由儿科医生或全科医生(GPs)随机抽取的12264名儿科门诊患者的样本。收集有关患者人口统计学,诊断和治疗的数据。诊断由ICD-9编码,药物由ATC分类编码。选择诊断为AOM(ICD-9代码:381和382)的患者进行分析。结果:AOM病例(873例)占样本的7.1%。在不同地区被诊断为AOM并接受抗生素治疗的儿童百分比存在明显差异,巴塞罗那的抗生素处方较高(占儿童的93%),斯摩棱斯克的抗生素处方最低(56.4%的儿童未接受抗生素治疗)。使用的抗生素差异很大:氨苄青霉素的使用几乎仅限于斯摩棱斯克(26.7%)和布拉迪斯拉发(13.8%),而阿莫西林加克拉维酸是图卢兹(33.8%),巴伦西亚(30.2%)和巴塞罗那(28.9%)的选择。 ,特内里费岛(51.7%)更经常开头孢菌素。最后,大环内酯类化合物在巴塞罗那(18.3%),巴伦西亚(17.5%)和特内里费岛(13.6%)中使用,但在图卢兹或索非亚中未使用。抗炎药仅在瓦伦西亚(31.7%),特内里费岛(27.2%)和图卢兹(17.4%)以及索非亚的耳科制剂中有用,在那里几乎每个孩子都接受了滴耳液(91.9%)。鼻制剂通常仅在索非亚(41.9%),布拉迪斯拉发(65.5%)和斯摩棱斯克(68.6%)中使用。结论:尽管大多数指南已达成共识,但观察到儿童单纯性AOM的治疗存在很大差异。在基层医疗中心应更加积极地鼓励非抗生素疗法用于AOM和首选抗生素的使用。需要进行研究以测量这些人群中普遍的抗生素耐药率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号