...
【24h】

Validation of a simple universal IELISA for the diagnosis of human brucellosis

机译:一种简单的通用IELISA在诊断人类布鲁氏菌病中的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The definitive diagnosis of brucellosis requires isolation of the agent, although negative isolation does not rule out the infection. In contrast, serological testing is more sensitive and, therefore, preferred in clinical practice. The majority of reported cases around the world were caused by Brucella melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis and B. canis. The first three species contain O-polysaccharide (OPS) on the cell surface, but B. canis contains no measurable OPS on the rough lipopolysaccharide (R-LPS). A universal indirect enzyme immunoassay for the detection of serum antibody to smooth and rough Brucella spp. in both normal (u-IELISA?) and rapid forms (R-u-IELISA?) has been developed, and, therefore, the potential use of this method was assessed in comparison to cELISA, conventional tests, IELISA and RSAT on a total of 478 sera. The 77 sera from blood donors with no clinical or epidemiological evidence of brucellosis and negative serological tests showed a specificity of 100 % for both u-IELISA? and R-u-IELISA?, with a cut-off value of %P 24 and %P 18, respectively. Sera from 49 culture-positive cases (16 B. suis, 15 B. abortus, 12 B. melitensis and 6 B. canis) yielded a sensitivity of 98 % for u-IELISA? and 95.9 % for R-u-IELISA?. In general, u-IELISA? showed good correlation with cELISA and IELISA for the detection of antibodies to smooth and rough Brucella strains, as well as for monitoring patients during treatment, but R-u-IELISA? seems to need additional optimisation. u-IELISA? is simple to perform and could be a suitable test for field laboratories and hospitals lacking skilled personnel.
机译:布鲁氏菌病的明确诊断需要隔离病原菌,尽管阴性隔离不能排除感染。相反,血清学检测更敏感,因此在临床实践中更可取。世界上大多数报告的病例是由布鲁氏菌,流产芽孢杆菌,猪芽孢杆菌和犬芽孢杆菌引起的。前三个物种在细胞表面含有O-多糖(OPS),但犬双歧杆菌在粗脂多糖(R-LPS)上不含可测量的OPS。一种通用的间接酶免疫测定法,用于检测抗光滑和粗糙布鲁氏菌属的血清抗体。已经开发了两种形式的正常(u-IELISA?)和快速形式(Ru-IELISA?)的药物,因此,与cELISA,常规检测,IELISA和RSAT相比,共评估了该方法的潜在用途478血清献血者的77份血清没有布鲁氏菌病的临床或流行病学证据,且血清学检查阴性,这两种u-IELISA的特异性均为100%。和R-u-IELISA™的截断值分别为%P 24和%P 18。来自49个培养阳性病例的血清(猪双歧杆菌,流产双歧杆菌15,流产双歧杆菌12和犬双歧杆菌6)的血清对u-IELISA的敏感性为98%?对于R-u-IELISA,为95.9%。一般来说,u-IELISA?在检测光滑和粗糙布鲁氏菌菌株的抗体以及在治疗过程中监测患者方面,与cELISA和IELISA表现出良好的相关性,但是R-u-IELISA?似乎需要进一步优化。 u-IELISA?操作简单,并且可能是缺乏熟练人员的现场实验室和医院的合适测试。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号