首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Impact of technical training on rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) in group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis
【24h】

Impact of technical training on rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) in group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis

机译:技术培训对A组链球菌扁桃体咽炎的快速抗原检测试验(RADT)的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are widely used for the rapid diagnosis of group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis. In a prospective 3-year study, the reliability of two different RADT methods was compared, as performed by lab technicians versus physicians. Sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values, were calculated. When performed by physicians, the results (44.4 %, 8.3 %, 26.7 % and 16.7 %) of a latex agglutination test (LAT) were unacceptably low. However, after switching to a lateral-flow immunoassay (LFIT) and implementing additional hands-on training, the performance improved dramatically (100 %, 92.6 %, 84.6 % and 100 %). In conclusion, technical errors, along with a lack of experience and expertise, negatively impact RADT accuracy.
机译:快速抗原检测试验(RADT)被广泛用于A组链球菌(GAS)扁桃体咽炎的快速诊断。在一项为期3年的前瞻性研究中,比较了实验室技术人员和医师进行的两种不同RADT方法的可靠性。计算敏感性和特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。当由医生进行时,乳胶凝集试验(LAT)的结果(44.4%,8.3%,26.7%和16.7%)太低了。但是,在切换到侧向流免疫测定(LFIT)并实施了额外的动手训练后,性能得到了显着改善(100%,92.6%,84.6%和100%)。总之,技术错误以及缺乏经验和专业知识都会对RADT准确性产生负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号