首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of two chromogenic media for the isolation and identification of urinary tract pathogens
【24h】

Evaluation of two chromogenic media for the isolation and identification of urinary tract pathogens

机译:两种生色介质用于尿路病原体分离和鉴定的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Chromogenic media (CM) are available for urine specimens (US) to enable rapid identification of common urinary tract pathogens (UTP). Two CM, chromID (TM) CPS (CPS4) agar (bioM,rieux, St. Laurent, QC) and UriSelect (TM) 4 (URS4) agar (Bio-Rad, Montreal, QC), were compared to the standard media (SM) for the isolation and identification of UTP. Over a 10-day period, US were inoculated to CPS4, URS4, and SM (BAP and MAC). CM interpretation was done according to the product inserts by one person blinded to the results of SM. SM were read by experienced technologists according to protocol and isolates were identified using BD Phoenix (TM). The results were grouped into significant (SG), mixed (MG), and no significant growth (NSG). A total of 903 US were studied. SM identified 239 SG, 112 MG, and 552 NSG cultures. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli (38 %) and Enterococcus spp. (11 %). Comparing CM to SM, the exact agreement was 89.3 and 89.5 % for URS4 and CPS4, respectively. When grouped by clinical significance, agreement with SM was 93.0 and 93.1 % for URS4 and CPS4, respectively. CM were equivalent with respect to processing time. Advantages include decreased need for automated identification of certain species, particularly E. coli. In terms of workflow, CM enables same-day identification for almost 50 % of significant UTP. Overall, both CM compared well to SM and allowed for rapid preliminary identification of many UTP.
机译:尿液标本(US)可使用生色介质(CM),以快速识别常见的尿路病原体(UTP)。将两个CM,chromID(TM)CPS(CPS4)琼脂(bioM,rieux,St.Laurent,QC)和UriSelect(TM)4(URS4)琼脂(Bio-Rad,Montreal,QC)与标准培养基进行比较( SM)用于隔离和识别UTP。在10天的时间里,美国接种了CPS4,URS4和SM(BAP和MAC)。一位不愿接受SM结果的人员根据产品说明书进行CM解释。 SM由经验丰富的技术人员根据规程进行读取,并使用BD Phoenix(TM)鉴定出分离株。结果分为显着(SG),混合(MG)和无显着增长(NSG)。总共研究了903 US。 SM鉴定出239 SG,112 MG和552 NSG培养物。最常见的病原体是大肠杆菌(38%)和肠球菌。 (11%)。将CM与SM进行比较,URS4和CPS4的确切一致性分别为89.3%和89.5%。按临床意义分组时,URS4和CPS4与SM的一致性分别为93.0%和93.1%。 CM在处理时间方面是等效的。优点包括减少了对某些物种(尤其是大肠杆菌)的自动识别的需求。在工作流程方面,CM可以对几乎50%的重要UTP进行当日识别。总体而言,两个CM与SM相比都很好,并且可以快速初步识别许多UTP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号