...
首页> 外文期刊>European Heart Journal: The Journal of the European Society of Cardiology >Diagnostic performance of non-invasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to detect coronary artery disease using different endpoints: detection of significant stenosis vs. detection of atherosclerosis.
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of non-invasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to detect coronary artery disease using different endpoints: detection of significant stenosis vs. detection of atherosclerosis.

机译:无创多探测器计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影在不同终点检测冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能:显着狭窄与动脉粥样硬化的检测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: The positive predictive value of multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detecting significant stenosis remains limited. Possibly CTA may be more accurate in the evaluation of atherosclerosis rather than in the evaluation of stenosis severity. However, a comprehensive assessment of the diagnostic performance of CTA in comparison with both conventional coronary angiography (CCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the study was to systematically investigate the diagnostic performance of CTA for two endpoints, namely detecting significant stenosis (using CCA as the reference standard) vs. detecting the presence of atherosclerosis (using IVUS as the reference of standard). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 100 patients underwent CTA followed by both CCA and IVUS. Only those segments in which IVUS imaging was performed were included for CTA and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis. On CTA, each segment was evaluated for significant stenosis (defined as >/= 50% luminal narrowing), on CCA significant stenosis was defined as a stenosis >/= 50%. Second, on CTA, each segment was evaluated for atherosclerotic plaque; atherosclerosis on IVUS was defined as a plaque burden of >/= 40% cross-sectional area. CTA correctly ruled out significant stenosis in 53 of 53 (100%) patients. However, nine patients (19%) were incorrectly diagnosed as having significant lesions on CTA resulting in sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 100, 85, 81, and 100%. CTA correctly ruled out the presence of atherosclerosis in 7 patients (100%) and correctly identified the presence of atherosclerosis in 93 patients (100%). No patients were incorrectly classified, resulting in sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 100%. Conclusions The present study is the first to confirm using both CCA and IVUS that the diagnostic performance of CTA is superior in the evaluation of the presence or the absence of atherosclerosis when compared with the evaluation of significant stenosis.
机译:目的:多探测器计算机断层血管造影(CTA)对检测严重狭窄的积极预测价值仍然有限。可能CTA在评估动脉粥样硬化方面比在评估狭窄严重程度方面更为准确。但是,与常规冠状动脉造影(CCA)和血管内超声(IVUS)相比,缺乏对CTA诊断性能的全面评估。因此,本研究的目的是系统地研究CTA在两个终点的诊断性能,即检测到严重狭窄(以CCA为参考标准)与检测动脉粥样硬化的存在(以IVUS为标准作为参考)。方法和结果:共有100例患者接受了CTA,随后进行了CCA和IVUS。仅将进行IVUS成像的那些部分包括在CTA和定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)分析中。在CTA上,评估每个节段的显着狭窄(定义为> / = 50%的管腔狭窄),在CCA上,显着狭窄被定义为狭窄> / = 50%。其次,在CTA上评估每个节段的动脉粥样硬化斑块。 IVUS上的动脉粥样硬化定义为斑块负担大于/ = 40%的横截面积。 CTA正确地排除了53例患者中有53例(100%)的严重狭窄。但是,有9名患者(19%)被错误诊断为CTA有明显病变,导致敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为100、85、81和100%。 CTA正确排除了7例患者(100%)的动脉粥样硬化,正确识别了93例患者(100%)的动脉粥样硬化。没有患者分类错误,导致敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值均为100%。结论本研究是第一个同时使用CCA和IVUS确认的方法,即与显着狭窄的评估相比,CTA的诊断性能在评估是否存在动脉粥样硬化方面要优越。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号