首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Innovation Management >FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS AS OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS AT UNIVERSITIES - COMPARATIVE DATA FROM SWEDEN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
【24h】

FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS AS OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMERCIALIZATION OF INNOVATIONS AT UNIVERSITIES - COMPARATIVE DATA FROM SWEDEN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

机译:作为知识产权拥有权的正式制度背景及其对大学中的创新商业化组织的启示-瑞典和英国的比较数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper identifies differences in institutional contexts (legislation) between Sweden and the UK and their effects on technology transfer policies. It then proceeds to examine how such activities are organized by universities. Empirical evidence from surveys conducted with technology transfer managers at eight Swedish universities and eleven UK universities gathered in Sweden and the UK during 2004 is analyzed. It is argued that the historical developments of these systems depend on different institutional contexts, which influence the modes of organization. The UK technology transfer system is based on similar legislation to that of the US, with IPRs being granted to the universities. The Swedish system, however, grants IPRs to the individual researchers, though with some new features - such as science parks and incubators - suggesting a change towards greater agent (university) involvement in encouraging technology transfer. This change indicates a breakthrough for the "entrepreneurial university" in Sweden.
机译:本文确定了瑞典和英国之间制度背景(立法)的差异及其对技术转让政策的影响。然后继续研究大学如何组织此类活动。分析了2004年与瑞典和英国的8所瑞典大学和11所英国大学的技术转让经理进行的调查得出的经验证据。有人认为,这些系统的历史发展取决于不同的制度背景,这会影响组织的模式。英国的技术转让体系以与美国相似的立法为基础,并向大学授予了知识产权。但是,瑞典的制度将知识产权授予个人研究人员,尽管具有一些新功能(例如科学园和孵化器),这表明朝着更大的代理人(大学)参与鼓励技术转让的方向转变。这一变化表明瑞典的“创业型大学”取得了突破。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号