首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Innovation Management >ANALYSING UBER IN SOCIAL MEDIA - DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY OR INSTITUTIONAL DISRUPTION?
【24h】

ANALYSING UBER IN SOCIAL MEDIA - DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY OR INSTITUTIONAL DISRUPTION?

机译:在社交媒体中分析Uber-破坏性技术还是制度性破坏?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Extant literature suggests that market disruptions take place because of two main reasons: technological disruption or institutional change. In view of these two alternative explanations, this paper aims to explore how the recent rise of the collaborative consumption platform Uber is perceived by consumers and whether this platform is primarily regarded as a technological innovation or as an institutional disruption. Drawing from a dataset of more than 6500 user-generated contents in social media, our findings suggest that Uber is not primarily perceived as a technological innovation, but rather as an institutional disruption.
机译:现有文献表明,发生市场混乱的原因主要有两个:技术破坏或体制变革。鉴于这两种替代性解释,本文旨在探讨消费者如何看待协作消费平台Uber的近期兴起,以及该平台主要被视为技术创新还是机构破坏。从社交媒体中6500多个用户生成的内容的数据集中得出的结论,我们的发现表明,优步并不是主要被视为技术创新,而是一种制度破坏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号