...
首页> 外文期刊>European eating disorders review >Convergent validity of the eating disorder examination and the eating disorder examination-questionnaire among university women in Norway
【24h】

Convergent validity of the eating disorder examination and the eating disorder examination-questionnaire among university women in Norway

机译:挪威大学女性饮食障碍检查和饮食障碍检查问卷的收敛效度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study compared the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE; 16.0) and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q; 6.0) and investigated the psychometric properties of the Norwegian translation of the EDE. Fifty-eight university women aged 19-41 years (mean BMI=23) were assessed with the EDE and EDE-Q. Satisfactory internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were demonstrated for the Norwegian translation of the EDE. Generally high convergent validity between the EDE and EDE-Q was found, with correlations ranging from 0.60 (Eating Concern) to 0.86 (Weight Concern). Agreement for OBEs and vomiting were excellent, while driven exercising generated lower levels of convergence. Consistent with prior studies, the EDE-Q generated significantly higher levels of psychopathology, although effect sizes were small. Owing to the significantly higher EDE-Q scores, it is ill advised to administer these two instruments interchangeably, as this may fail to produce meaningful data.
机译:本研究比较了饮食失调考试(EDE; 16.0)和饮食失调考试问卷(EDE-Q; 6.0),并研究了EDE挪威语翻译的心理计量学特性。用EDE和EDE-Q评估了58名19-41岁(平均BMI = 23)的大学女性。对于EDE的挪威语翻译,证明了令人满意的内部一致性和评估者间的可靠性。在EDE和EDE-Q之间通常发现较高的收敛效度,其相关性从0.60(饮食关注)到0.86(体重关注)不等。 OBE和呕吐的协议非常出色,而驱使运动则导致较低的收敛水平。与先前的研究一致,EDE-Q产生的精神病理学水平明显更高,尽管效果很小。由于EDE-Q得分明显较高,因此不建议将这两种工具互换使用,因为这可能无法产生有意义的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号