...
首页> 外文期刊>European eating disorders review >Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-2) in Two Danish Samples: A Comparison between Female Eating Disorder Patients and Females from the General Population
【24h】

Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-2) in Two Danish Samples: A Comparison between Female Eating Disorder Patients and Females from the General Population

机译:验证两个丹麦样本中的饮食失调清单(EDI-2):女性饮食失调患者与一般人群中女性的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Eating Disorder Inventory, Version 2 (EDI-2) is a questionnaire used clinically and in research all over the world.EDI-2 is cross-culturally valid, yet normative values may depend on culture. Norms and reliability of the Danishversion have to date been lacking, and will be presented in this article, comparing patients (N= 575) and controls(N= 881). Also, internal reliability of scales is tested for both groups. Differences between norms of the Danish andthe North American version of EDI were small but significant for all scales except asceticism (eating disorderpatients) and ineffectiveness, interpersonal distrust and maturity fears (normal controls). For both groups theinternal consistency was >0.70 for all subscales except asceticism. Although differences across the eating disorderdiagnostic groups were dubious, the EDI-2 is useful to screen for eating problems in the general population as well asto rate progress and outcome among eating disorder patients.
机译:《饮食失调量表》第2版(EDI-2)是一种在全球范围内临床和研究中使用的问卷。EDI-2具有跨文化有效性,但规范价值可能取决于文化。迄今为止尚缺乏Danishversion的规范和可靠性,本文将通过比较患者(N = 575)和对照组(N = 881)来介绍。同样,对两组的秤的内部可靠性都进行了测试。丹麦和北美版本的EDI规范之间的差异很小,但在所有范围内都很显着,除了禁欲主义(饮食障碍患者)和无效,人际互不信任和成熟恐惧(正常对照)之外。对于两组,除禁欲主义外,所有分量表的内部一致性> 0.70。尽管饮食失调诊断组之间的差异尚不确定,但EDI-2可用于筛查一般人群的饮食问题以及评估饮食失调患者的进展和结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号