【24h】

Of circles and spirals: bridging the gap between the leading circle and spiral wave concepts of cardiac reentry.

机译:圆形和螺旋形:弥合心脏折返的引导圆和螺旋波概念之间的差距。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The "leading circle model" was the first detailed attempt at understanding the mechanisms of functional reentry, and remains a widely-used notion in cardiac electrophysiology. The "spiral wave" concept was developed more recently as a result of modern theoretical analysis and is the basis for consideration of reentry mechanisms in present biophysical theory. The goal of this paper is to present these models in a way that is comprehensible to both the biophysical and electrophysiology communities, with the idea of helping clinical and experimental electrophysiologists to understand better the spiral wave concept and of helping biophysicists to understand why the leading circle concept is so attractive and widely used by electrophysiologists. To this end, the main properties of the leading circle and spiral wave models of reentry are presented. Their basic assumptions and determinants are discussed and the predictions of the two concepts with respect to pharmacological responses of arrhythmias are reviewed. A major difference between them lies in the predicted responses to Na(+)-channel blockade, for which the spiral wave paradigm appears more closely to correspond to the results of clinical and experimental observations. The basis of this difference is explored in the context of the fundamental properties of the models.
机译:“领先圈模型”是了解功能性折返机制的首次详细尝试,并且仍然是心脏电生理学中广泛使用的概念。作为现代理论分析的结果,“螺旋波”概念是最近发展起来的,并且是考虑当前生物物理理论中折返机制的基础。本文的目的是以一种对生物物理和电生理领域都可以理解的方式来介绍这些模型,以帮助临床和实验电生理学家更好地理解螺旋波的概念,并帮助生物物理学家理解为什么领导圈子。这个概念是如此吸引人,并被电生理学家广泛使用。为此,介绍了前导圆和折返螺旋波模型的主要特性。讨论了它们的基本假设和决定因素,并回顾了关于心律失常的药理反应的两个概念的预测。它们之间的主要区别在于对Na(+)通道阻滞的预测反应,为此,螺旋波范式似乎更接近于临床和实验观察的结果。在模型的基本属性的上下文中探索了这种差异的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号