...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Law Monthly >Compensation for revocation of planning permission
【24h】

Compensation for revocation of planning permission

机译:撤销规划许可的补偿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 the Supreme Court considered an appeal from the Health and Safety at Work Executive on the question of whether it is always open to a local planning authority, in considering under s97 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 whether it appears to be expedient to revoke or modify a permission to develop land, to have regard to the compensation that it would or might have to pay under s107.
机译:在《健康与安全执行官v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34》一案中,最高法院在根据《美国健康与安全执行官》第97条的规定进行审议时,对工作中的健康与安全主管是否始终向地方规划部门开放的问题进行了上诉。 1990年《城镇与乡村计划法》,是否似乎宜于撤销或修改开发土地的许可,要考虑到根据第107条将要或可能要支付的补偿金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号