首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Law Monthly >ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE R (on the application of Michael Willams) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change and RWE Innogy UK Limited
【24h】

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE R (on the application of Michael Willams) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change and RWE Innogy UK Limited

机译:环境司法R(在Michael Williams的申请下)v能源与气候变化大臣和RWE Innogy UK Limited

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Environmental judicial review where EC Directive engaged- making a challenge to a decision in time Judicial review and similar statutory challenges to planning decisions need to be made within 6 weeks of the decision being made. However, there are some subtle differences depending on the kind of regime which applies. In this case the Claimant, Mr Michael Williams, had launched a judicial review of the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change's decision to approve a major wind farm of 32 turbines close to his home at Clocaenog Forest in North Wales under the Planning Act 2008. He argued at trial that the Secretary of State failed to comply with Council Directive 92/43/EEC ("the Habitats Directive") and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ("the Habitats Regulations").
机译:EC指令参与的环境司法复审-对决策提出及时的挑战司法复审和对规划决策的类似法定挑战需要在做出决策后的6周内进行。但是,根据适用的制度类型,会有一些细微的差异。在这种情况下,索赔人迈克尔·威廉姆斯先生已就能源和气候变化大臣根据《 2008年规划法》批准其北威尔士克洛卡诺格森林家附近的32台主要风力涡轮机的决定启动司法审查。 。他在庭审中辩称,国务卿未遵守理事会第92/43 / EEC号指令(《人居指令》)和2010年《人居和物种保护条例》(《人居条例》)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号