首页> 外文期刊>Ethology >Memory and Brain in Food-Storing Birds: Space Oddities or Adaptive Specializations
【24h】

Memory and Brain in Food-Storing Birds: Space Oddities or Adaptive Specializations

机译:食物储存鸟类的记忆和大脑:空间奇数或适应性专门化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scatterhoarding birds that cache food items have become an important model system for the study of spatial memory and its correlates in the brain. In particular, it has been suggested that through adaptive specialization, species that cache food have better spatial memory and a relatively larger hippocampus than their non-caching relatives. Critics of this approach, dubbed neuroecology, maintain that neither of these hypotheses has been confirmed. Here, we review the evidence pertaining to a correlation between food-storing capability and the relative volume of the hippocampus. Hippocampal volume has been related to food-storing behaviour in comparisons between species, within species, or within individuals, but the evidence is not consistent. There are several possible reasons for this inconsistency, including: (1) food-hoarding birds may not always use memory for retrieval, (2) there may be systematic differences between data from North American and Eurasian species that affect the analysis, and (3) sample sizes have in many cases been too small. In addition, both the independent variable (degree of food-hoarding specialization) and the dependent variable (relative volume of the hippocampus) are not clearly and consistently defined. Alternatively, it is possible that the neuroecological hypothesis is false. Systematic empirical research is necessary to determine whether or not food-storing birds have evolved adaptive specializations in brain and cognition.
机译:散布食物的散乱鸟类已经成为研究空间记忆及其在大脑中的相关性的重要模型系统。特别地,已经提出,通过适应性专门化,与非速配亲戚相比,速食的物种具有更好的空间记忆和相对更大的海马体。对这种方法的批评者被称为神经生态学,认为这些假设都没有得到证实。在这里,我们回顾了有关食物储存能力与海马相对体积之间相关性的证据。在物种之间,物种内部或个体内部进行比较时,海马体积与储粮行为有关,但证据并不一致。这种不一致的原因可能有多种,其中包括:(1)ard积食物的鸟类可能并不总是使用记忆来进行检索;(2)北美和欧亚物种的数据之间可能存在系统差异,从而影响分析;(3) )样本大小在很多情况下都太小。此外,对自变量(食物贮藏专业化程度)和因变量(海马相对体积)均没有明确一致的定义。或者,神经生态学假设可能是错误的。需要进行系统的经验研究,以确定储粮鸟类是否已发展出大脑和认知的适应性专业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号