首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsy & behavior: E&B >Is intravenous lorazepam really more effective and safe than intravenous diazepam as first-line treatment for convulsive status epilepticus? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Is intravenous lorazepam really more effective and safe than intravenous diazepam as first-line treatment for convulsive status epilepticus? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:静脉注射劳拉西m作为抽搐性癫痫持续状态的一线治疗真的比静脉注射地西epa更有效和安全吗?对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Some guidelines or expert consensus indicate that intravenous (IV) lorazepam (LZP) is preferable to IV diazepam (DZP) for initial treatment of convulsive status epilepticus (SE). We aimed to critically assess all the available data on efficacy and tolerability of IV LZP compared with IV DZP as first-line treatment of convulsive SE.
机译:背景:一些指南或专家共识表明,对于惊厥性癫痫持续状态(SE)的初始治疗,静脉注射(IV)劳拉西m(LZP)比静脉注射地西epa(DZP)更可取。我们旨在严格评估所有有关IV LZP疗效和耐受性的现有数据,与IV DZP作为惊厥性SE的一线治疗相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号