首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsy & behavior: E&B >Screening for depression in people with epilepsy: Comparative study among Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression Subscale (HADS-D), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
【24h】

Screening for depression in people with epilepsy: Comparative study among Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression Subscale (HADS-D), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

机译:筛查癫痫患者的抑郁症:癫痫性神经疾病抑郁量表(NDDI-E),医院焦虑和抑郁量表抑郁量表(HADS-D)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: We aimed to assess and compare the psychometric properties of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression Subscale (HADS-D), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) as screening ir|struments for depression and suicidality in people with epilepsy. Methods: One hundred twenty-six people (54% women) diagnosed with epilepsy were recruited and evaluated on their sociodemographic and clinical.features. Depression and suicide risk were assessed with a structured psychiatric interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-PI us), and the performance of NDDI-E, HADS-D, and BDI was evaluated.Results: The sensitivity and specificity of BDI for the diagnosis of depression was around 90%; HADS-D and NDDI-E have sensitivity higher than 80%, and specificity was greater than 75%. For identifying suicide risk, the NDDI-E sensitivity was 92.9%, and HADS-D sensitivity was 85.7%, and a reasonable specificity (68%) was observed for both instruments. All instruments showed a negative predictive value of over 90%. Comparisons of the areas under the ROC curve for these instruments were not significantly different regarding depression or moderate/severe risk of suicide.Conclusion: All three instruments evaluated have clinical utility in the screening of depression in people with epilepsy. Both NDDI-E and HADS-D are brief efficient screening instruments to identify depression in people with epilepsy. The BDI is a more robust instrument, but it takes longer to apply, which hampers its use by busy clinicians and by people with cognitive impairment.
机译:目的:我们旨在评估和比较癫痫性神经疾病抑郁量表(NDDI-E),医院焦虑和抑郁量表抑郁量表(HADS-D)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)的心理计量学特性作为筛查手段。用于癫痫患者的抑郁和自杀。方法:招募了一百二十六名患有癫痫病的人(占女性的54%),并对其社会人口统计学和临床​​特征进行了评估。通过结构化精神病学访谈,Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview(MINI-PI us)评估了抑郁和自杀风险,并评估了NDDI-E,HADS-D和BDI的表现。结果:BDI对儿童的敏感性和特异性抑郁症的诊断率约为90%; HADS-D和NDDI-E的敏感性高于80%,特异性大于75%。为了确定自杀风险,NDDI-E敏感度为92.9%,HADS-D敏感度为85.7%,两种仪器均观察到合理的特异性(68%)。所有仪器均显示超过90%的阴性预测值。这些仪器的ROC曲线下面积的比较在抑郁症或中度/重度自杀风险方面无显着差异。结论:评估的所有三种仪器在筛查癫痫患者的抑郁症中具有临床效用。 NDDI-E和HADS-D都是简短有效的筛查工具,可识别癫痫患者的抑郁症。 BDI是一种更强大的工具,但是需要花费更长的时间,这阻碍了繁忙的临床医生和认知障碍者的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号