...
首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsia: Journal of the International League against Epilepsy >A study of the effect of color photostimulation from a cathode-ray tube (CRT) display on photosensitive patients: the effect of alternating red-cyan flicker stimulation.
【24h】

A study of the effect of color photostimulation from a cathode-ray tube (CRT) display on photosensitive patients: the effect of alternating red-cyan flicker stimulation.

机译:阴极射线管(CRT)显示器上的彩色光刺激对光敏患者的影响研究:交替的红蓝闪烁刺激的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: In an attempt to establish evidence for developing better guidelines for the production of animation programs that would not induce photosensitive seizures in Japan, we evaluated the effects of red flicker, alternating red/cyan (complementary color to red) flicker stimuli, and of contrast between the red and cyan frames from a cathode-ray tube (CRT) display in photosensitive patients. METHODS: We studied 35 photosensitive patients. They were exposed to seven types of flicker. The first three types were alternating red/cyan flicker (R/C) with the luminance of cyan set at three different levels, high, equal, and low luminance (65, 20, and 16 cd/m2, respectively) relative to the red (20 cd/m2). The following four types were red, cyan, yellow, and magenta flicker stimuli. EEGs were recorded while the patients watched these stimuli on a CRT display. RESULTS: Rates of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) provocation were 11.4, 13.7, and 14.0% with high-, no- and low-contrast R/C flicker, respectively, and 3.7% with red flicker. The differences between red and each of the other R/C flicker stimuli were all statistically significant (p<0.05, 0.01, 0.01). No significant differences were found between the effects by each of the three levels of contrast in alternating R/C flicker (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that alternating R/C flicker is more provocative than simple red flicker, and that contrast between frames of different colors may play some role in the effects of alternating flicker stimuli from a CRT display in photosensitive patients. Therefore, caution against the use of the combination of red and cyan, in addition to the red flicker stimulus, should be included in any guidelines drawn up to prevent photosensitive seizures.
机译:用途:为了建立证据以开发更好的指导方针,以制作动画节目,在日本不会引起光敏性癫痫发作,我们评估了红色闪烁,红色/青色(红色与红色的互补色)闪烁刺激以及阴极射线管(CRT)显示的红色和青色帧在光敏患者中的对比度。方法:我们研究了35名光敏患者。他们受到了七种闪烁的影响。前三种是红色/青色闪烁(R / C),青色的亮度设置为相对于红色的三种不同级别,分别为高,相等和低亮度(分别为65、20和16 cd / m2)。 (20 cd / m2)。以下四种类型是红色,青色,黄色和洋红色闪烁刺激。当患者在CRT显示器上观看这些刺激时,记录了EEG。结果:高对比度,无对比度和低对比度R / C闪烁的光阵发反应(PPR)激发率分别为11.4%,13.7%和14.0%,红色闪烁则为3.7%。红色与其他R / C闪烁刺激之间的差异均具有统计学意义(p <0.05,0.01,0.01)。在交替的R / C闪烁中,三个对比度等级的每一个之间的效果之间没有发现显着差异(p> 0.05)。结论:这些发现表明,交替的R / C闪烁比简单的红色闪烁更具挑衅性,并且不同颜色的帧之间的对比度可能在光敏患者的CRT显示器的交替闪烁刺激中起一定作用。因此,为防止光敏性癫痫发作而制定的任何指南中,除红色闪烁刺激外,还应注意不要使用红色和青色的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号