首页> 外文期刊>Ethics and medicine: An International Journal of Bioethics >'Give Me Children or I'll Die!' Is it Time to Consider the Uterus as a Non- vital Organ Transplant?
【24h】

'Give Me Children or I'll Die!' Is it Time to Consider the Uterus as a Non- vital Organ Transplant?

机译:“给我孩子,否则我会死!”是时候考虑将子宫作为非重要器官移植了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Organ transplantation and assisted reproduction have inhabited separate ethical domains. Since they have evolved disparately, neither has found it necessary to overlap the other-either technically or ethically. That status quo is changing. Organ recipients are now biological parents. The journal Clinical Transplantation has been reporting pregnancy outcomes after solid organ transplantation. Included are parents and children sharing the burden of immune suppression.1 A portion of the organ recipient cohort was most likely assisted by reproductive technology, although this data is confidential. In this solitary context, minimal overlap has not been problematic. Informed titration of immune suppression has protected parent, transplanted organ, and child. The risks of organ rejection, cancer, or teratogenicity have not been untoward.
机译:器官移植和辅助生殖已经占据了单独的伦理领域。由于它们的发展截然不同,因此没有人发现有必要在技术上或道德上使另一个重叠。这种现状正在改变。器官接受者现在是亲生父母。 《临床移植》杂志已经报道了实体器官移植后的妊娠结局。其中包括父母和孩子共同承担免疫抑制的重担。1尽管这些数据是机密的,但器官接受者队列的一部分最有可能受到生殖技术的帮助。在这种单独的情况下,最小的重叠不是问题。免疫抑制的知情滴定可以保护父母,移植器官和孩子。器官排斥,癌症或致畸性的风险并非令人不快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号