...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Pollution Research >Evaluation of foam surfactant for foam-flushing technique in remediation of DDT-contaminated soil using data envelopment analysis method
【24h】

Evaluation of foam surfactant for foam-flushing technique in remediation of DDT-contaminated soil using data envelopment analysis method

机译:数据包络分析法评价泡沫表面活性剂用于泡沫冲洗技术对DDT污染土壤的修复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With an aim to select the most appropriate foaming surfactant for remediation of DDT-contaminated soil by foam-flushing technique, the performances of nonionic and anionic surfactant in several aspects were observed in this study. SDS had the best foam static characteristic among the four experimental surfactants. The solubilizing ability for DDT followed the order of Tween80 > TX100 > SDS > Brij35. The adsorption loss of SDS onto soil was the lowest. The order of desorption efficiency for DDT followed as TX-100 > Tween80 > Brij35 > SDS. Based on these experimental investigations, the overall performances of foaming surfactants were evaluated by data envelopment analysis method. The results indicated that SDS was the optimal alternative for remediation of DDT-contaminated soil by foam-flushing technique. This conclusion was reached with the consideration of the cost, foam static characteristic, surfactant adsorption loss, solubilizing ability, and desorption efficiency of surfactant for DDT.
机译:为了选择最适合的泡沫表面活性剂,通过泡沫冲洗技术修复被DDT污染的土壤,本研究观察了非离子和阴离子表面活性剂在几个方面的性能。在四种实验表面活性剂中,SDS具有最佳的泡沫静态特性。 DDT的增溶能力遵循Tween80> TX100> SDS> Brij35的顺序。 SDS在土壤上的吸附损失最低。 DDT的解吸效率顺序为TX-100> Tween80> Brij35> SDS。在这些实验研究的基础上,通过数据包络分析法评估了发泡表面活性剂的整体性能。结果表明,SDS是泡沫冲洗技术修复DDT污染土壤的最佳选择。考虑到成本,泡沫静态特性,表面活性剂吸附损失,增溶能力和表面活性剂对DDT的解吸效率,得出了该结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号