首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Entomology >Blend chemistry and field attraction of commercial sex pheromone lures to grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and a nontarget tortricid in vineyards.
【24h】

Blend chemistry and field attraction of commercial sex pheromone lures to grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and a nontarget tortricid in vineyards.

机译:商业性信息素诱剂的化学组成和野外吸引作用融合到葡萄蛾(鳞翅目:Tortricidae)和葡萄园中的非靶标类龟中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Anecdotal reports by scientists and growers suggested commercial sex pheromone lures were ineffective with monitoring field populations of grape berry moth, Paralobesia viteana (Clemens), in vineyards. This study addressed the need to evaluate commercial sex pheromone lures for chemical purity and efficacy of attracting grape berry moth and a nontarget tortricid, the sumac moth, Episumus argutanus (Clemens). The percentage of chemical components from a set of eight lures from each manufacturer was found using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and confirmed by chemical standards. No lures adhered to the 9:1 blend of (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate (Z9-12:Ac) to (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (Z11-14:Ac), though Suterra (9.1:1), ISCA (5.7:1), and Trece (5.4:1) lures were closest. The Trece lures contained ~98 micro g Z9-12:Ac, which is 3-51 times more than the other lures. The Suterra and ISCA lures were loaded with ~29 and 33 micro g Z9-12:Ac, and the Alpha Scents lures only contained ~2 micro g Z9-12:Ac. An antagonistic impurity, (E)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (E9-12:Ac), was found in all manufacturer lures at concentrations from 3.2 to 4.8%. Field attraction studies were done in summer 2010, and again in 2011, to evaluate commercial lures for their potential to attract P. viteana and E. argutanus in the presence of lures from other manufacturers. Separate experiments were established in two vineyards in Augusta County, VA, one with open and the other with wooded surroundings. In field experiments, Suterra lures detected P. viteana most often, Trece lures detected more E. argutanus, and ISCA lures detected P. viteana in the open vineyard the least, while Alpha Scents lures were least attractive to E. argutanus in both environments. Fewer P. viteana were captured in the wooded versus open vineyard, which may limit the potential for sex pheromone monitoring of P. viteana in wooded vineyards.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN13033
机译:科学家和种植者的轶事报告表明,商业性信息素诱饵无法有效监测葡萄园中葡萄浆果蛾(Parlobesia viteana(Clemens))的田间种群。这项研究满足了需要评估商业性信息素诱饵的化学纯度和吸引葡萄蛾和非目标类三头动物漆树蛾Episumus argutanus(Clemens)的功效。使用气相色谱-质谱法测定每个制造商的八种诱剂中化学成分的百分比,并通过化学标准进行确认。尽管有Suterra(9.1:1),但(Z)-9-十二碳烯基乙酸酯(Z9-12:Ac)与(Z)-11-十四碳烯基乙酸酯(Z11-14:Ac)的9:1混合物没有诱剂附着, ISCA(5.7:1)和Trece(5.4:1)的诱饵距离最近。 Trece诱剂含〜98 micro g Z9-12:Ac,是其他诱剂的3-51倍。 Suterra和ISCA诱饵装有〜29和33 micro g Z9-12:Ac,而Alpha Scents诱饵仅包含〜2 micro g Z9-12:Ac。在所有制造商的诱剂中发现拮抗性杂质(E)-9-十四碳烯乙酸酯(E9-12:Ac)的浓度为3.2%至4.8%。在2010年夏季和2011年再次进行了野外吸引研究,以评估商业诱饵在存在其他制造商的诱饵的情况下,是否具有吸引P. viteana和E. argutanus的潜力。在弗吉尼亚州奥古斯塔县的两个葡萄园中建立了单独的实验,一个葡萄园是开放的,另一个是树木繁茂的环境。在野外实验中,Suterra诱饵最常检测到维塔纳假单胞菌,而Trece诱饵在空旷的葡萄园中检测到更多的古罗马肠杆菌,而ISCA诱饵检测到的维塔纳假单胞菌最少,而在两种环境中,Alpha气味诱剂对E. argutanus的吸引力最低。在树木繁茂的葡萄园与开放式葡萄园中捕获的维氏假单胞菌较少,这可能限制了在木质葡萄园中对维氏假单胞菌进行性信息素监测的潜力。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN13033

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号