首页> 外文期刊>Equine Veterinary Journal >Comparison between radiological and magnetic resonance imaging lesions in the distal border of the navicular bone with particular reference to distal border fragments and osseous cyst-like lesions
【24h】

Comparison between radiological and magnetic resonance imaging lesions in the distal border of the navicular bone with particular reference to distal border fragments and osseous cyst-like lesions

机译:鼻骨远端边界的放射和磁共振成像病变之间的比较,特别是针对远端边界碎片和骨样囊样病变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

P>Reasons for performing study:There are no data concerning the accuracy of conventional and computed or digital radiography for evaluation of the equine foot.Objectives:To compare conventional film-screen and computed radiography with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of distal border fragments of the navicular bone; and to establish which type of fragment was more likely to be detected radiologically.Methods:Horses were included if forelimb lameness was localised to the foot and both radiography and high-field MR images had been acquired. Horses were divided into 2 groups based on acquisition of conventional (Group A) or computed (Group B) radiographs. The presence of distal border fragments was recorded. From MR images, distal border fragments were graded based on their size and changes in signal intensity in the adjacent navicular bone. Sensitivity and specificity of conventional and computed radiography for detection of fragments were calculated using MRI as the gold standard. A Chi-squared test was used to test for associations between specific radiological and MRI findings in the distal border of the navicular bone.Results:In Group A 46 and 18 fragments were identified on MR and radiographic images, respectively; in Group B 45 and 17 fragments were seen. There was no significant difference between computed and conventional radiography. Grades 4 and 5 fragments or large-sized fragments were identified most frequently; low-grade fragments were unlikely to be observed. There was a significant correlation between radiological and MRI abnormalities of the distal border of the navicular bone.Conclusions:Conventional and computed radiography had similar, rather low sensitivity for identification of distal border fragments of the navicular bone, but specificity was high. Large-sized and high-grade fragments were most likely to be identified radiologically.Potential relevance:Fragments observed radiologically are likely to be associated with other pathological abnormalities of the distal border of the navicular bone.
机译:P>进行研究的原因:尚无有关常规和计算机或数字射线照相术对马脚进行评估的准确性的数据。目的:将常规胶片屏幕和计算机射线照相与磁共振成像(MRI)进行远端影像学检查的比较鼻骨的边界碎片;方法:如果前肢la足定位在足部,并且已经获得了放射线照相和高场MR图像,则包括马匹。根据常规(A组)或计算机(B组)X射线照片的获取,将马分为两组。记录远端边界碎片的存在。从MR图像中,根据远侧边界碎片的大小和相邻鼻骨中信号强度的变化对远侧边界碎片进行分级。使用MRI作为金标准,计算了常规和计算机射线照相术对碎片检测的敏感性和特异性。结果:在A组中,在MR和X光片上分别鉴定出46个和18个碎片;在卡方检验中,检验了在放射状和MRI影像之间的关联。在B组中观察到45和17个片段。计算机X线摄影与传统X线摄影之间没有显着差异。最常见的是4级和5级碎片或大型碎片。低等级的碎片不太可能被观察到。结论:常规和计算机射线照相术对鼻骨远端边界碎片的识别相似,但敏感性较低,但特异性很高。潜在的相关性:放射学上观察到的碎片可能与航海骨远端边界的其他病理异常有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号