...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health perspectives. >Contrasting Theories of Interaction in Epidemiology and Toxicology
【24h】

Contrasting Theories of Interaction in Epidemiology and Toxicology

机译:流行病学和毒理学中相互作用的相反理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologists and toxicologists face similar problems when assessing inter-actions between exposures, yet they approach the question very differently. The epidemiologic definition of "inter-action" leads to the additivity of risk differences (RDA) as the fundamental criterion for causal inference about biological inter-actions. Toxicologists define "inter-action" as departure from a model based on mode of action: concentration addition (CA; for similarly acting compounds) or independent action (IA; for compounds that act differently).
机译:背景:流行病学家和毒理学家在评估暴露之间的相互作用时面临类似的问题,但是他们对问题的看法却截然不同。 “相互作用”的流行病学定义导致风险差异(RDA)的加和,这是对生物学相互作用进行因果推理的基本标准。毒理学家将“相互作用”定义为基于作用方式的模型偏离:浓度增加(CA;作用相似的化合物)或独立作用(IA;作用不同的化合物)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号