首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Claims Journal >Employer Liability, Risk Assessment and Fault Principle
【24h】

Employer Liability, Risk Assessment and Fault Principle

机译:雇主责任,风险评估和过失原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The UK Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA), section 69 has ensured that claims can only succeed on the civil burden of proof (balance of probabilities) that the employer has been negligent. The act also impacts on environmental liability and its "green purposes" are set out in chapter 24, part 1, which compel the employer to take measures in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol and encourage biodiversity. The broader framework of tort liability in this area of employer/employee relationship needs exploration to determine if such a policy-based approach is likely to make much difference given the tendency of courts to regard a breach of a worker-protective statute as evidence of fault It is an important question for industry in common law jurisdictions because employers are likely to estimate their liabilities based on cost/benefit ratio in the work-place and invest in a safer premises under a fault-based system.
机译:《 2013年英国企业和监管改革法》(ERRA)第69条确保,索赔只能在雇主疏忽大意的民事举证责任(概率均衡)下才能成功。该法案还影响环境责任,其“绿色目的”在第24章第1部分中进行了阐述,该条款迫使雇主根据《京都议定书》采取措施并鼓励生物多样性。在雇主/雇员关系这一领域中,更广泛的侵权责任框架需要探索,以确定这种基于政策的方法是否可能产生很大的不同,因为法院倾向于将违反劳动者保护法的行为视为过错的证据。在普通法司法管辖区中,这是一个重要的行业问题,因为用人单位可能会根据工作场所的成本/收益比率来估算其负债,并在基于故障的系统下投资于更安全的场所。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号