...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health perspectives. >Vulnerability as a function of individual and group resources in cumulative risk assessment.
【24h】

Vulnerability as a function of individual and group resources in cumulative risk assessment.

机译:在累积风险评估中,漏洞是个人和团队资源的函数。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The field of risk assessment has focused on protecting the health of individual people or populations of wildlife from single risks, mostly from chemical exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently began to address multiple risks to communities in the "Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment" [EPA/630/P02/001F. Washington DC:Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003)]. Simultaneously, several reports concluded that some individuals and groups are more vulnerable to environmental risks than the general population. However, vulnerability has received little specific attention in the risk assessment literature. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to examine the issue of vulnerability in cumulative risk assessment and present a conceptual framework rather than a comprehensive review of the literature. In this article we consider similarities between ecologic and human communities and the factors that make communities vulnerable to environmental risks. DISCUSSION: The literature provides substantial evidence on single environmental factors and simple conditions that increase vulnerability or reduce resilience for humans and ecologic systems. This observation is especially true for individual people and populations of wildlife. Little research directly addresses the topic of vulnerability in cumulative risk situations, especially at the community level. The community level of organization has not been adequately considered as an end point in either human or ecologic risk assessment. Furthermore, current information on human risk does not completely explain the level of response in cumulative risk conditions. Ecologic risk situations are similarly more complex and unpredictable for cases of cumulative risk. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial conditions and responses are the principal missing element for humans. We propose a model for including psychologic and social factors as an integral component of cumulative risk assessment.
机译:背景:风险评估领域的重点是保护个人或野生动植物种群的健康免受单一风险的影响,主要是避免化学物质的暴露。美国环境保护局最近开始在“累积风险评估框架” [EPA / 630 / P02 / 001F]中解决社区面临的多种风险。华盛顿特区:美国环境保护署风险评估论坛(2003)]。同时,一些报告得出的结论是,某些个人和群体比一般人群更容易受到环境风险的影响。但是,脆弱性在风险评估文献中几乎没有受到特别关注。目的:我们的目标是研究累积风险评估中的脆弱性问题,并提出一个概念性的框架,而不是对文献进行全面的审查。在本文中,我们考虑了生态社区与人类社区之间的相似性以及使社区易受环境风险影响的因素。讨论:文献提供了单一的环境因素和简单条件的大量证据,这些因素会增加对人类和生态系统的脆弱性或降低其复原力。对于个人和野生动植物种群而言,这种观察尤其如此。很少有研究直接涉及累积风险情况下的脆弱性主题,尤其是在社区一级。在人类或生态风险评估中,社区级别的组织还没有被充分考虑为终点。此外,有关人类风险的最新信息并不能完全解释累积风险条件下的应对水平。同样,对于累积风险而言,生态风险情况也更为复杂且不可预测。结论:社会心理状况和反应是人类的主要缺失要素。我们提出了一个模型,将心理和社会因素纳入累积风险评估的组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号