首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science >Deliberate misrepresentation of the rainfall patterns of Australia: There are norainfall reductions in Australia caused by the globally increasing anthropogenic carbon dioxideemission
【24h】

Deliberate misrepresentation of the rainfall patterns of Australia: There are norainfall reductions in Australia caused by the globally increasing anthropogenic carbon dioxideemission

机译:故意歪曲澳大利亚的降雨模式:由于全球人为二氧化碳排放量的增加,澳大利亚的降雨没有减少

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This work presents the truly measured rainfall patterns of Australia. Two recent works by Delworth and Zeng and by Karoly have wrongly claimed a reduction in rainfall for selected areas of Australia, allegedly caused by increasing anthropogenic carbon dioxide emission. Here we show that the rainfall pattern of Australia is actually quite stable when compatible time windows are compared and the rainfall is globally increasing. Since climate parameters oscillate with a quasi 60 years interval it makes sense to compare periods related to these 60 years periodicities rather than select a peak with a valley of the same oscillation. Even if the map of the measured rainfalls does not show any general sign of rainfall reduction, it is possible that selected sub-regions may show such a reduction. Such a local effect may result from many possible causes including change of land use, urbanization and water management, and there is no reason to suppose from the start that it is related in any way to global carbon dioxide emissions. We also show here that measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes show Australia is a top sequestering rather than a top emitting country. The predictions of DelwOrth and Zeng and of Karoly are based on models rather than observations and are a false explanation of a problem that does not exist.
机译:这项工作展示了澳大利亚真实测量的降雨模式。 Delworth和Zeng以及Karoly最近的两篇作品错误地声称减少了澳大利亚某些地区的降雨,据称这是由于人为二氧化碳排放量增加所致。在这里,我们显示,通过比较兼容的时间窗并且全球范围内的降雨,澳大利亚的降雨模式实际上非常稳定。由于气候参数以大约60年的时间间隔振荡,因此比较60年周期相关的周期而不是选择具有相同振荡谷值的峰值是有意义的。即使测得的降雨图没有显示出降雨减少的任何一般迹象,选定的子区域也有可能显示出这种减少的迹象。这种局部影响可能是由许多可能的原因引起的,包括土地用途的变化,城市化和水资源管理,并且没有理由从一开始就认为它与全球二氧化碳排放量有任何关系。我们在这里还表明,对二氧化碳通量的测量表明,澳大利亚是封存量最大的国家,而不是排放量最大的国家。 DelwOrth和Zeng以及Karoly的预测基于模型而不是观察结果,并且是对不存在的问题的错误解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号